Perera Frederica P, Vineis Paolo
Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
IARC Sci Publ. 2011(163):337-62.
Molecular epidemiology was introduced in the study of cancer in the early 1980s, with the expectation that it would help overcome some important limitations of epidemiology and facilitate cancer prevention. The first generation of biomarkers has indeed contributed to our understanding of mechanisms, risk and susceptibility as they relate largely to genotoxic carcinogens, resulting in interventions and policy changes to reduce risk from several important environmental carcinogens. New and promising biomarkers are now becoming available for epidemiological studies, including alterations in gene methylation and gene expression, proteomics and metabolomics. However, most of these newer biomarkers have not been adequately validated, and their role in the causal paradigm is not clear. Systematic validation of these newer biomarkers is urgently needed and can take advantage of the principles and criteria established over the past several decades from experience with the first generation of biomarkers. Prevention of only 20% of cancers in the United States alone would result in 300 000 fewer new cases annually, avoidance of incalculable suffering, and a savings in direct financial costs of over US$20 billion each year (1). Molecular epidemiology can play a valuable role in achieving this goal.
分子流行病学于20世纪80年代初被引入癌症研究领域,人们期望它能帮助克服流行病学的一些重要局限性,并促进癌症预防。第一代生物标志物确实有助于我们理解癌症机制、风险和易感性,因为它们在很大程度上与遗传毒性致癌物相关,从而带来了干预措施和政策变化,以降低几种重要环境致癌物带来的风险。如今,新的、有前景的生物标志物正可用于流行病学研究,包括基因甲基化和基因表达的改变、蛋白质组学和代谢组学。然而,这些更新的生物标志物大多尚未得到充分验证,它们在因果关系范式中的作用也不明确。迫切需要对这些更新的生物标志物进行系统验证,这可以借鉴过去几十年从第一代生物标志物的经验中确立的原则和标准。仅在美国,预防20%的癌症每年就将减少30万例新发病例,避免难以估量的痛苦,并每年节省超过200亿美元的直接经济成本(1)。分子流行病学在实现这一目标方面可以发挥重要作用。