Department of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Bio Engineering at the University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Biomed Eng Online. 2012 Sep 21;11:73. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-11-73.
Functional time-varying cardiac elastances (FTVE) contain a rich amount of information about the specific cardiac state of a patient. However, a FTVE waveform is very invasive to directly measure, and is thus currently not used in clinical practice. This paper presents a method for the estimation of a patient specific FTVE, using only metrics that are currently available in a clinical setting.
Correlations are defined between invasively measured FTVE waveforms and the aortic and pulmonary artery pressures from 2 cohorts of porcine subjects, 1 induced with pulmonary embolism, the other with septic shock. These correlations are then used to estimate the FTVE waveform based on the individual aortic and pulmonary artery pressure waveforms, using the "other" dysfunction's correlations as a cross validation.
The cross validation resulted in 1.26% and 2.51% median errors for the left and right FTVE respectively on pulmonary embolism, while the septic shock cohort had 2.54% and 2.90% median errors.
The presented method accurately and reliably estimated a patient specific FTVE, with no added risk to the patient. The cross validation shows that the method is not dependent on dysfunction and thus has the potential for generalisation beyond pulmonary embolism and septic shock.
功能时变心脏弹性(FTVE)包含有关患者特定心脏状态的大量信息。然而,FTVE 波形非常侵入性,难以直接测量,因此目前未在临床实践中使用。本文提出了一种仅使用临床环境中当前可用的指标来估计患者特定 FTVE 的方法。
在两个猪科动物队列中,定义了与侵入性测量的 FTVE 波形之间的相关性,一个队列诱导肺动脉栓塞,另一个队列诱导感染性休克。然后,使用“其他”功能障碍的相关性进行交叉验证,基于个体的主动脉和肺动脉压力波形来估计 FTVE 波形。
在肺动脉栓塞时,左右 FTVE 的交叉验证中位数误差分别为 1.26%和 2.51%,而感染性休克队列的中位数误差分别为 2.54%和 2.90%。
所提出的方法准确可靠地估计了患者特定的 FTVE,对患者没有额外的风险。交叉验证表明,该方法不依赖于功能障碍,因此具有超越肺动脉栓塞和感染性休克的普遍适用性的潜力。