Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
J Vestib Res. 2012 Jan 1;22(2):95-104. doi: 10.3233/VES-2012-0443.
Few reliable tests are available for screening people rapidly for vestibular disorders although such tests would be useful for a variety of testing situations. Balance testing is widely performed but of unknown value for screening. The goal of this study was to determine the value of tests of walking balance for screening people with vestibular impairments. We tested three groups of patients with known vestibular impairments: benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, unilateral vestibular weakness, and post-acoustic neuroma resection. We compared them to normal subjects. All subjects were independently ambulatory without gait aids. Subjects were tested on tandem walking (TW) with eyes open and eyes closed for 10 steps, walking with no additional head motions and with augmented head rotations in yaw for 7 m (WwHT), and an obstacle avoidance task, the Functional Mobility Test (FMT). Subjects wore a 3-D motion sensor centered at mid-torso to capture kinematic measures. Patients and normals differed significantly on some behavioral measures, such as the number of steps to perform TW, and on some but not all kinematic measures. ROC analyses, however, were at best only moderate, and failed to find strong differences and cut-points that would differentiate the groups. These findings suggest that although patients and normals differ in performance of these tests in some interesting ways the groups are not sufficiently different on these tests for easy use as screening tests to differentiate the populations.
虽然对于各种测试情况来说,快速筛选前庭障碍人群的可靠测试都很有用,但目前这类测试还比较缺乏。平衡测试的应用非常广泛,但对于筛选人群来说其价值未知。本研究旨在确定用于筛选前庭功能受损人群的行走平衡测试的价值。我们测试了三组已知存在前庭功能障碍的患者:良性阵发性位置性眩晕、单侧前庭功能减弱和听神经瘤切除术后。我们将他们与正常受试者进行了比较。所有受试者均无需行走辅助器即可独立行走。受试者接受了睁眼和闭眼 10 步的并足行走测试(TW)、不进行额外头部运动和进行 7 m 的偏航头部旋转(WwHT)、以及障碍物回避任务,即功能性移动测试(FMT)。受试者佩戴一个位于躯干中部的 3D 运动传感器,以获取运动学测量数据。患者和正常人在某些行为测量指标上存在显著差异,例如完成 TW 的步数,以及某些但非所有运动学测量指标。然而,ROC 分析的效果最多只是中等,无法发现足以区分这些组的显著差异和分界值。这些发现表明,尽管患者和正常人在这些测试的表现上存在一些有趣的差异,但这些组在这些测试上的差异不足以作为简单的筛选测试来区分人群。