• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在全科医疗中确定用于眩晕患者诊断准确性研究的评估测试:一项德尔菲研究。

Identifying tests to evaluate in a diagnostic accuracy study for patients with vertigo in general practice: a Delphi study.

作者信息

Leemeyer Anna-Marie R, Ross Andrew K, Bruintjes Tjasse D, Cals Jochen W L, van Leeuwen Roeland B, Lissenberg-Witte Birgit I, van Vugt Vincent A, Maarsingh Otto R

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan, Amsterdam, 1117, the Netherlands.

Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2025 Aug 2;26(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02920-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-025-02920-z
PMID:40753388
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Vertigo is a common symptom that strongly impacts patients' quality of life. More than 80% of patients experiencing vertigo are primarily treated by their general practitioner (GP). The GP's'diagnostic toolkit' for vertigo has serious limitations, though, because diagnostic accuracy studies on conditions that may cause vertigo have never been performed in a general practice setting. Our aim was to determine which tests should be investigated in a diagnostic accuracy study for patients with vertigo in general practice.

METHOD

We conducted an online Delphi procedure involving national and international experts. The experts were asked to judge a selection of 40 diagnostic tests based on the Dutch GP guideline on vestibular symptoms, supplemented by tests identified during a systematic review. Panellists were allowed to suggest additional tests after the first round. In case of consensus of at least 70%, a test was included or excluded. We also conducted a secondary sub-analysis of our Delphi procedure to demonstrate non-dominance of Dutch experts within our expert panel. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.

RESULTS

A panel of 20 experts from five countries, including 7 specialists in otolaryngology, 6 neurologists and 7 GPs, participated in the Delphi procedure. The panel judged 46 diagnostic tests in total, with 6 additional tests added to the original selection based on suggestions by experts. After the first two rounds (100% response rate), 16 tests were included, 22 tests were excluded and no consensus was reached on 8 tests. During the consensus round, one of the 8 tests was added to the included 16 tests. Of these 17 tests, 15 are recommended by the Dutch GP guideline, supplemented by the non-recommended Tandem walking test and the Romberg test.

CONCLUSIONS

An international expert panel reached consensus on 17 tests for vertigo in general practice that should be investigated in a diagnostic accuracy study.

摘要

引言

眩晕是一种常见症状,对患者的生活质量有很大影响。超过80%的眩晕患者主要由其全科医生(GP)进行治疗。然而,全科医生用于眩晕的“诊断工具包”存在严重局限性,因为在全科医疗环境中从未进行过关于可能导致眩晕病症的诊断准确性研究。我们的目的是确定在全科医疗中针对眩晕患者的诊断准确性研究中应调查哪些测试。

方法

我们进行了一项涉及国内和国际专家的在线德尔菲法程序。专家们被要求根据荷兰全科医生关于前庭症状的指南,对40项诊断测试进行评估,并辅以系统评价中确定的测试。在第一轮之后,小组成员可以建议其他测试。如果至少70%达成共识,则纳入或排除一项测试。我们还对德尔菲法程序进行了二次子分析,以证明荷兰专家在我们的专家小组中不占主导地位。使用描述性统计和内容分析对数据进行分析。

结果

来自五个国家的20名专家组成的小组参与了德尔菲法程序,其中包括7名耳鼻喉科专家(otolaryngology)、6名神经科医生和7名全科医生。该小组总共评估了46项诊断测试,根据专家建议在最初的选择中增加了6项测试。在前两轮(100%的回复率)之后,16项测试被纳入,22项测试被排除,8项测试未达成共识。在共识轮中,8项测试中的一项被添加到纳入的16项测试中。在这17项测试中,15项是荷兰全科医生指南推荐的,另外补充了未被推荐的串联行走测试和罗姆伯格测试(Romberg test)。

结论

一个国际专家小组就全科医疗中用于眩晕的17项测试达成了共识,这些测试应在诊断准确性研究中进行调查。

相似文献

1
Identifying tests to evaluate in a diagnostic accuracy study for patients with vertigo in general practice: a Delphi study.在全科医疗中确定用于眩晕患者诊断准确性研究的评估测试:一项德尔菲研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Aug 2;26(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02920-z.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome.头部脉冲测试、眼震测试和斜视角检查用于诊断急性前庭综合征的中枢性病因。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 2;11(11):CD015089. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015089.pub2.
6
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
7
Clinical symptoms, signs and tests for identification of impending and current water-loss dehydration in older people.老年人即将发生和当前失水脱水的识别的临床症状、体征及检查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 30;2015(4):CD009647. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009647.pub2.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
10
Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people.初级保健医生对有症状人群进行全因痴呆或认知障碍诊断的临床判断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):CD012558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012558.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective diagnostic accuracy study of history taking and physical examination for adults with vertigo in general practice: study protocol.前瞻性诊断准确性研究:一般实践中成人眩晕患者的问诊和体格检查:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 2;14(4):e085715. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085715.
2
Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome.头部脉冲测试、眼震测试和斜视角检查用于诊断急性前庭综合征的中枢性病因。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 2;11(11):CD015089. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015089.pub2.
3
Video-Oculography to Guide Neuroimaging for Dizziness and Vertigo.
视频眼震图引导头晕和眩晕的神经影像学检查
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 May 1;148(5):474-475. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.0330.
4
Current concepts in acute vestibular syndrome and video-oculography.急性前庭综合征及视频眼震图的现代概念。
Curr Opin Neurol. 2022 Feb 1;35(1):75-83. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001017.
5
Deep-learning-based MRI in the diagnosis of cerebral infarction and its correlation with the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio.基于深度学习的 MRI 在脑梗死诊断中的应用及其与中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的相关性。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Nov;10(11):11370-11381. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1786.
6
Diagnostic Value of Straight Head Hanging in Posterior Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo.直头悬挂试验在后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕中的诊断价值
J Clin Neurol. 2021 Oct;17(4):558-562. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2021.17.4.558.
7
Capturing vertigo in the emergency room: three tools to double the rate of diagnosis.在急诊室捕捉眩晕:三种工具可将诊断率提高一倍。
J Neurol. 2022 Jan;269(1):294-306. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10627-1. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
8
Differentiating central from peripheral causes of acute vertigo in an emergency setting with the HINTS, STANDING, and ABCD2 tests: A diagnostic cohort study.在急诊环境中使用 HINTS、STANDING 和 ABCD2 试验区分急性眩晕的中枢性和外周性病因:一项诊断性队列研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;28(12):1368-1378. doi: 10.1111/acem.14337. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
9
Acute vestibular syndrome: is skew deviation a central sign?急性前庭综合征:偏斜性眼震是中枢性体征吗?
J Neurol. 2022 Mar;269(3):1396-1403. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10692-6. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
10
Efficacy of the subjective visual vertical test performed using a mobile application to detect vestibular pathology.使用移动应用程序进行主观视觉垂直测试以检测前庭病变的疗效。
J Vestib Res. 2022;32(1):21-27. doi: 10.3233/VES-201526.