Veterans Research and Education Foundation, VA Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Obes Surg. 2013 Jan;23(1):71-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0773-2.
Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) has recently been introduced as a potential therapy for the treatment of obesity. The main challenge for the new generation of devices is to achieve desired clinical outcomes at a suitably low level of energy consumption. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of GES with continuous and intermittent duty cycles in reducing food intake and body weight in diet-induced obesity-prone rats.
In macro duty cycle experiment, 40 rats were divided into groups to receive a sham GES, continuous GES, or intermittent GES (15 min On-45 min Off or 15 min On-15 min Off) for 28 days. In micro duty cycle experiment, 18 rats received cross-over treatment of continuous stimulation, 60 % time cycle or 40 % time cycle. Food intake, body weight, gastric emptying and ghrelin level were measured to evaluate the effect of different GES.
GES with macro duty cycle intensity-dependently reduced mean daily food intake increase by 18.6, 10.2 and -6.0 % compared to 42.7 % with sham GES and body weight gain by 6.1 %, 3.4 and -0.8 % compared to 5 % with sham GES. Daily food intake decreased with increasing micro duty cycle intensity, averaging 16.5, 15.6 and 13.7 g/day under 40 % cycle, 60 % cycle and continuous stimulation respectively. Gastric emptying was intensity-dependently delayed by GES. GES has no effect in modulating plasma ghrelin level.
GES energy-dependently reduces food intake, body weight and gastric emptying. Peripheral modulation of plasma ghrelin level is not related to the GES effects.
胃电刺激(GES)最近被引入作为肥胖治疗的一种潜在疗法。新一代设备的主要挑战是在适当低的能量消耗水平下实现预期的临床效果。本研究旨在比较连续和间歇工作模式的 GES 在减少饮食诱导肥胖易感大鼠的食物摄入和体重方面的效果。
在宏观工作模式实验中,将 40 只大鼠分为接受假 GES、连续 GES 或间歇 GES(15 分钟 ON-45 分钟 OFF 或 15 分钟 ON-15 分钟 OFF)治疗的组,治疗 28 天。在微观工作模式实验中,18 只大鼠接受连续刺激、60%时间周期或 40%时间周期的交叉治疗。通过测量食物摄入量、体重、胃排空和胃饥饿素水平来评估不同 GES 的效果。
宏观工作模式强度依赖性地降低了平均每日食物摄入量,与假 GES 相比分别减少了 18.6%、10.2%和 6.0%,与假 GES 相比体重增加减少了 6.1%、3.4%和 0.8%。随着微观工作模式强度的增加,每日食物摄入量逐渐减少,在 40%周期、60%周期和连续刺激下,平均分别为 16.5、15.6 和 13.7 克/天。胃排空随 GES 强度依赖性地延迟。GES 对调节血浆胃饥饿素水平没有影响。
GES 能量依赖性地减少食物摄入、体重和胃排空。外周调节血浆胃饥饿素水平与 GES 效应无关。