• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

屈伸-旋转躯干测试评估腹肌耐力:可靠性、学习效应和性别差异。

Flexion-rotation trunk test to assess abdominal muscle endurance: reliability, learning effect, and sex differences.

机构信息

Sports Research Center, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, Elche, Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Jun;27(6):1602-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827124d9.

DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827124d9
PMID:23007488
Abstract

Trunk endurance tests are generally performed in sagittal or frontal plane. However, trunk field tests that measure the endurance of the rotator muscles are lacking. In view of this situation, we developed a flexion-rotation trunk test (FRT test) to assess the oblique abdominal muscle endurance. This new field test consists mainly in performing the maximum number of upper trunk flexion and rotation movements (reps) possible in 90 seconds. The objectives of this study were to analyze the FRT test reliability and to examine the effect of both the repetition and sex on test results. Fifty-one recreationally trained men (n = 35) and women (n = 16) completed 4 trials of the FRT test (T1, T2, T3, and T4), separated by 7 days each. The scores increased significantly between T1 and T3 (p < 0.001), showing a clear learning effect, but the increase between T3 and T4 was only 4.25% (p = 0.108). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between trials were ≥0.83 and the standard errors of measurement (SEMs) ≤7.54 reps. The ICCs between trials increased, and SEMs decreased with test repetition, reaching an ICC of 0.94 and an SEM of 6.46 reps between T3 and T4. The comparison between sexes showed a higher abdominal endurance in men when compared with that in women (p = 0.003), and also a higher learning effect in men, especially at the beginning of the study. These findings suggest that, the FRT test is a reliable field protocol that differentiates between the abdominal endurance of men and women. However, it is necessary to perform an extensive familiarization period before testing (at least 3 trials of practice) to make learning effect negligible.

摘要

躯干耐力测试通常在矢状面或额状面进行。然而,缺乏衡量旋转肌耐力的躯干场测试。鉴于这种情况,我们开发了一种屈伸躯干测试(FRT 测试)来评估腹斜肌耐力。这个新的场测试主要包括在 90 秒内完成尽可能多的上躯干屈伸和旋转动作(重复次数)。本研究的目的是分析 FRT 测试的可靠性,并研究重复次数和性别对测试结果的影响。51 名有规律运动的男性(n = 35)和女性(n = 16)完成了 4 次 FRT 测试(T1、T2、T3 和 T4),每次测试之间间隔 7 天。T1 和 T3 之间的得分显著增加(p < 0.001),表现出明显的学习效应,但 T3 和 T4 之间的增加仅为 4.25%(p = 0.108)。测试之间的组内相关系数(ICC)≥0.83,测量标准误差(SEM)≤7.54 次。随着测试重复,ICC 增加,SEM 降低,T3 和 T4 之间的 ICC 达到 0.94,SEM 达到 6.46 次。性别之间的比较表明,男性的腹部耐力明显高于女性(p = 0.003),而且男性的学习效应更高,尤其是在研究开始时。这些发现表明,FRT 测试是一种可靠的场测试方法,可以区分男女的腹部耐力。然而,在测试前(至少进行 3 次练习测试)需要进行广泛的熟悉阶段,以消除学习效应。

相似文献

1
Flexion-rotation trunk test to assess abdominal muscle endurance: reliability, learning effect, and sex differences.屈伸-旋转躯干测试评估腹肌耐力:可靠性、学习效应和性别差异。
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Jun;27(6):1602-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827124d9.
2
Reliability assessment and correlation analysis of 3 protocols to measure trunk muscle strength and endurance.测量躯干肌肉力量和耐力的3种方案的可靠性评估及相关性分析。
J Sports Sci. 2018 Feb;36(4):357-364. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1307439. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
3
Interrater reliability of six tests of trunk muscle function and endurance.六种躯干肌肉功能和耐力测试的评分者间信度。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997 Oct;26(4):200-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1997.26.4.200.
4
Electromyographic and Kinematic Analysis of the Flexion-Rotation Trunk Test.屈髋-旋转试验的肌电图和运动学分析。
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Dec;34(12):3386-3394. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002168.
5
Isokinetic trunk flexion-extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: Reliability, learning effect, and sex differences.等速躯干屈伸方案评估躯干肌肉力量和耐力:可靠性、学习效应和性别差异。
J Sport Health Sci. 2020 Dec;9(6):692-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
6
Reliability of five trunk flexion and extension endurance field-based tests in high school-aged adolescents: ISQUIOS programme.5 种基于现场的躯干屈伸耐力测试在高中青少年中的可靠性:ISQUIOS 计划。
J Sports Sci. 2021 Aug;39(16):1860-1872. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1903706. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
7
Reliability and validity of lumbar and abdominal trunk muscle endurance tests in office workers with nonspecific subacute low back pain.非特异性亚急性下背痛上班族腰椎和腹部躯干肌肉耐力测试的信度和效度
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(4):399-408. doi: 10.3233/BMR-140460.
8
Dynamic trunk muscle endurance profile in adolescents aged 14-18: Normative values for age and gender differences.14至18岁青少年的动态躯干肌肉耐力概况:年龄和性别差异的标准值
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018 Feb 6;31(1):155-162. doi: 10.3233/BMR-169760.
9
A comparison of two isometric tests of trunk flexor endurance.两种等长躯干屈肌耐力测试方法的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Jul;26(7):1939-44. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318237ea1c.
10
Reliability of lower quarter physical performance measures in healthy service members.健康军人下肢身体机能测量的可靠性
US Army Med Dep J. 2011 Jul-Sep:37-49.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of anthropometric characteristics on isometric trunk muscle endurance tests: A reliability and performance analysis.人体测量学特征对等长躯干肌肉耐力测试的影响:一项可靠性与性能分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0324787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324787. eCollection 2025.
2
Gender-specific reference values of dynamometric and non-dynamometric trunk performance in individuals with different body fat percentages: A preliminary study.不同体脂百分比个体的动力和非动力躯干性能的性别特异性参考值:初步研究。
Narra J. 2024 Apr;4(1):e303. doi: 10.52225/narra.v4i1.303. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
3
Body Composition and Fitness Characteristics of Firefighters Participating in a Health and Wellness Program: Relationships and Descriptive Data.
参与健康与健身计划的消防员的身体成分和体能特征:关系和描述性数据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 26;19(23):15758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315758.
4
Reliability of Field-Based Fitness Tests in Adults: A Systematic Review.成人现场体能测试的可靠性:一项系统综述。
Sports Med. 2022 Aug;52(8):1961-1979. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01635-2. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
5
Isometric Strength Database for Muscle Maximal Voluntary Endurance Field Tests: Normative Data.肌肉最大自主耐力现场测试的等长力量数据库:标准数据。
Sports Med Open. 2021 Jul 12;7(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00338-2.
6
Isokinetic trunk flexion-extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: Reliability, learning effect, and sex differences.等速躯干屈伸方案评估躯干肌肉力量和耐力:可靠性、学习效应和性别差异。
J Sport Health Sci. 2020 Dec;9(6):692-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
7
Trunk Lateral Flexor Endurance and Body Fat: Predictive Risk Factors for Low Back Pain in Child Equestrian Athletes.躯干侧屈耐力与体脂:儿童马术运动员腰痛的预测风险因素
Children (Basel). 2020 Oct 9;7(10):172. doi: 10.3390/children7100172.
8
Efficacy of School-Based Interventions for Improving Muscular Fitness Outcomes in Adolescent Boys: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.基于学校的干预措施对提高青少年男性肌肉健康结果的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2020 Mar;50(3):543-560. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01215-5.
9
Trunk Strength Characteristics of Elite Alpine Skiers - a Comparison with Physically Active Controls.优秀高山滑雪运动员的躯干力量特征——与体育活动对照组的比较
J Hum Kinet. 2017 Jun 22;57:51-59. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0046. eCollection 2017 Jun.