Suppr超能文献

等速躯干屈伸方案评估躯干肌肉力量和耐力:可靠性、学习效应和性别差异。

Isokinetic trunk flexion-extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: Reliability, learning effect, and sex differences.

机构信息

Sports Research Centre, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, Elche, 03202, Spain.

Sports Research Centre, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, Elche, 03202, Spain.

出版信息

J Sport Health Sci. 2020 Dec;9(6):692-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and the learning effect of an isokinetic trunk flexion-extension protocol designed to simultaneously assess trunk muscle strength and endurance. In addition, the effect of the participants' sex on the reliability data was examined.

METHODS

Fifty-seven healthy and physically active young men (n = 28) and women (n = 29) performed the isokinetic protocol 5 times, separated by a week between each of the first 4 sessions and by a month between the last 2 sessions. The protocol consisted of performing 4 trials of 15 maximum flexion-extension concentric exertions at 120°/s (range of trunk motion = 50°). The absolute and relative peak torque and total work were calculated to assess trunk flexion and extension strength. In addition, endurance ratio, modified endurance ratio, fatigue final ratio, recovery ratio, and modified recovery ratio variables were used for the assessment of trunk muscle endurance in both directions.

RESULTS

Regarding the absolute reliability, no relevant changes were found between paired-comparison sessions for most strength and endurance variables, except for total work and relative total work variables in the flexion movement in both sexes. In addition, the typical error of the isokinetic variables was lower than 10% in both males and females, and minimum detectable changes ranged from 7% to 20%, with a tendency to be higher in females and in endurance variables. The strength variables showed high-to-excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; >0.74); however, for the endurance variables only the endurance ratio and the modified endurance ratio obtained moderate-to-high ICC values (0.57 < ICC < 0.82). In addition, the analysis of the variance reported no significant differences between consecutive pairs of sessions for most variables in both sexes.

CONCLUSION

Overall, these findings provide clinicians, trainers, and researchers with a 10-min single-session protocol to perform a reliable muscle strength and endurance evaluation of trunk flexor and extensor muscles, all within the same protocol.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验一种等速躯干屈伸方案的可靠性和学习效应,该方案旨在同时评估躯干肌肉力量和耐力。此外,还研究了参与者性别对可靠性数据的影响。

方法

57 名健康、活跃的年轻男性(n=28)和女性(n=29)分别进行了 5 次等速方案,前 4 次之间相隔 1 周,最后 2 次之间相隔 1 个月。方案包括进行 4 次 15 次最大屈伸向心收缩,速度为 120°/s(躯干运动范围=50°)。计算绝对和相对峰值扭矩和总功,以评估躯干屈伸力量。此外,还使用屈伸方向的耐力比、改良耐力比、疲劳终值比、恢复比和改良恢复比变量来评估躯干肌肉耐力。

结果

就绝对可靠性而言,大多数强度和耐力变量在男女两性的配对比较中均无明显变化,除了屈伸运动中的总功和相对总功变量。此外,等速变量的典型误差在男性和女性中均低于 10%,最小可检测变化范围为 7%至 20%,女性和耐力变量中倾向于更高。力量变量的组内相关系数(ICC;>0.74)较高;然而,对于耐力变量,只有耐力比和改良耐力比获得了中至高 ICC 值(0.57 < ICC < 0.82)。此外,方差分析报告称,在男女两性中,大多数变量在连续的配对比较中均无显著差异。

结论

总体而言,这些发现为临床医生、教练和研究人员提供了一种 10 分钟的单次方案,可在同一方案中对躯干屈肌和伸肌的肌肉力量和耐力进行可靠评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f007/7749212/c88faf2788a2/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验