• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物标志物对乳腺癌临床试验风险的影响。

Impact of biomarkers on clinical trial risk in breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Nov;136(1):179-85. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2247-6. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-012-2247-6
PMID:23007573
Abstract

We determined the success rate of new drug approval by the US FDA in two breast cancer indications, one of which used a biomarker. This allowed us to assess if biomarkers improved clinical trial risk in breast cancer. We performed a retrospective screening of industry-sponsored drug development programs registered on clinicaltrials.gov from 1998 to 2012 for HER2-positive patients compared to patients that had either failed or had been exposed to anthracycline or taxane, whose first phase I in this indication occurred no earlier than 1998. Compounds not registered on clinicaltrials.gov and studied exclusively outside the US were excluded. Twenty-nine drugs for HER2-positive patients and 28 drugs for anthracycline/taxane-exposed patients met our screening criteria. The overall success rate of new drug development in anthracycline/taxane patients was only 15 %, while in HER2-positive patients it was 23 %. However, HER2-targeted therapies underperformed compared to broad acting agents. The cost for clinical trial testing alone, when adjusted for the risk of failure, for HER2-positive breast cancer patients was $199 million, significantly lower than the cost of $274 million for anthracycline/taxane-experienced patients. The use of a validated biomarker, such as HER2, reduced clinical trial risk by as much as 50 % resulting in cost savings of 27 % in advanced and metastatic breast cancer. However, these data have to be evaluated in a context in which studies combining a novel drug with a novel biomarker not yet recognized by the FDA may actually increase clinical trial risk.

摘要

我们确定了美国 FDA 在两种乳腺癌适应症新药批准的成功率,其中一种使用了生物标志物。这使我们能够评估生物标志物是否改善了乳腺癌临床试验的风险。我们对 1998 年至 2012 年期间在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册的行业赞助药物开发项目进行了回顾性筛选,比较了 HER2 阳性患者与那些已经失败或已经接受蒽环类或紫杉烷治疗的患者,其在该适应症的首次 I 期临床试验不早于 1998 年。不注册于 clinicaltrials.gov 且仅在美国境外研究的化合物被排除在外。符合我们筛选标准的 HER2 阳性患者的药物有 29 种,蒽环类/紫杉烷暴露患者的药物有 28 种。蒽环类/紫杉烷暴露患者新药开发的总体成功率仅为 15%,而 HER2 阳性患者的成功率为 23%。然而,HER2 靶向治疗的表现逊于广泛作用的药物。考虑到失败的风险,HER2 阳性乳腺癌患者的临床试验测试费用为 1.99 亿美元,远低于蒽环类/紫杉烷经验丰富患者的 2.74 亿美元。使用经过验证的生物标志物(如 HER2)可降低临床试验风险高达 50%,从而在晚期和转移性乳腺癌中节省 27%的成本。然而,这些数据必须在这样一种背景下进行评估,即在研究中,将一种新药与一种尚未得到 FDA 认可的新生物标志物相结合的研究可能实际上会增加临床试验的风险。

相似文献

1
Impact of biomarkers on clinical trial risk in breast cancer.生物标志物对乳腺癌临床试验风险的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Nov;136(1):179-85. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2247-6. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
2
Phosphorylated/activated HER2 as a marker of clinical resistance to single agent taxane chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.磷酸化/激活的HER2作为转移性乳腺癌单药紫杉烷化疗临床耐药的标志物。
Cancer Invest. 2005;23(6):483-7. doi: 10.1080/07357900500201301.
3
Capecitabine after anthracycline and taxane exposure in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients: response, survival and prognostic factors.曲妥珠单抗治疗后 HER2 阴性转移性乳腺癌患者接受卡培他滨治疗:疗效、生存和预后因素。
Anticancer Res. 2011 Mar;31(3):1079-86.
4
HER2/CEP17 ratio and HER2 immunohistochemistry predict clinical outcome after first-line trastuzumab plus taxane chemotherapy in patients with HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive metastatic breast cancer.HER2/CEP17 比值和 HER2 免疫组化预测 HER2 荧光原位杂交阳性转移性乳腺癌患者一线曲妥珠单抗联合紫杉烷化疗后的临床结局。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;72(1):109-15. doi: 10.1007/s00280-013-2174-1. Epub 2013 May 15.
5
Biomarkers and receptor targeted therapies reduce clinical trial risk in non-small-cell lung cancer.生物标志物和受体靶向治疗可降低非小细胞肺癌临床试验风险。
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Feb;9(2):163-9. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000075.
6
Evidence-based use of neoadjuvant taxane in operable and inoperable breast cancer.可手术及不可手术乳腺癌中新辅助紫杉烷类药物的循证应用
Clin Cancer Res. 2004 May 15;10(10):3249-61. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0133.
7
Cost comparison of capecitabine in patients with breast cancer.卡培他滨治疗乳腺癌患者的成本比较。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec;33(6):550-6. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181c06f94.
8
Lapatinib versus trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy (GeparQuinto, GBG 44): a randomised phase 3 trial.拉帕替尼对比曲妥珠单抗联合新辅助蒽环类紫杉类化疗(GeparQuinto,GBG 44):一项随机 3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Feb;13(2):135-44. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70397-7. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
9
The role of anthracyclines in the treatment of early breast cancer.蒽环类药物在早期乳腺癌治疗中的作用。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2015 Jun;21(3):201-12. doi: 10.1177/1078155214531513. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
10
[Chemotherapy for breast cancer refractory to anthracycline, taxane or trastuzumab].[针对对蒽环类、紫杉烷类或曲妥珠单抗耐药的乳腺癌的化疗]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2009 May;36(5):726-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Cilengitide sensitivity is predicted by overall integrin expression in breast cancer.西仑吉肽敏感性可通过乳腺癌中整合素的整体表达来预测。
Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Dec 20;26(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01942-2.
2
The Effect of Biomarker Use on the Speed and Duration of Clinical Trials for Cancer Drugs.生物标志物的应用对癌症药物临床试验速度和持续时间的影响。
Oncologist. 2022 Oct 1;27(10):849-856. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac130.
3
Precision Medicine: An Optimal Approach to Patient Care in Renal Cell Carcinoma.精准医学:肾癌患者护理的最佳方法
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 14;9:766869. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.766869. eCollection 2022.
4
Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in US FDA-Approved Drug Labels (2000-2020).美国食品药品监督管理局批准的药品标签中的药物基因组生物标志物(2000 - 2020年)
J Pers Med. 2021 Mar 4;11(3):179. doi: 10.3390/jpm11030179.
5
Does biomarker use in oncology improve clinical trial failure risk? A large-scale analysis.生物标志物在肿瘤学中的应用是否会增加临床试验失败的风险?一项大规模分析。
Cancer Med. 2021 Mar;10(6):1955-1963. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3732. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
6
The growing role of precision and personalized medicine for cancer treatment.精准医学和个性化医学在癌症治疗中日益重要的作用。
Technology (Singap World Sci). 2018 Sep-Dec;6(3-4):79-100. doi: 10.1142/S2339547818300020. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
7
Clinical Trial Risk in Hepatitis C: Endpoint Selection and Drug Action.丙型肝炎临床试验风险:终点选择与药物作用。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:6260271. doi: 10.1155/2016/6260271. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
8
Clinical implications of basic research in hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌基础研究的临床意义
J Hepatol. 2016 Mar;64(3):736-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
9
Phosphorylated ribosomal S6 (p-rpS6) as a post-treatment indicator of HER2 signalling targeted drug resistance.磷酸化核糖体S6(p-rpS6)作为HER2信号靶向耐药性的治疗后指标。
Biomarkers. 2015;20(5):313-22. doi: 10.3109/1354750X.2015.1068865.
10
Controversies in colorectal cancer: First line treatment with epidermal growth factor inhibitors and RAS in 2014.2014年结直肠癌的争议:表皮生长因子抑制剂与RAS的一线治疗
Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2014 Apr;35(2):140-2. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.138960.