*Department of Pharmacy, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; †HCor Onco Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil and Oncoclínicas do Brasil, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil; ‡Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and §Department of Biology, University of Toronto at Mississauga, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Feb;9(2):163-9. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000075.
This study analyzed the risk of clinical trial failure during non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) drug development between 1998 and January 2012. We also looked for factors that impacted clinical trial risk in NSCLC.
NSCLC drug development was investigated using trial disclosures from http://www.clinicaltrials.gov and other publically available resources. Compounds were excluded from the analysis if they had begun phase I clinical testing before 1998, did not use treatment-relevant endpoints, or if they did not have a completed phase I trial in NSCLC. Analysis was conducted in regard to treatment indication, compound classification, and mechanism of action.
Six hundred seventy-six clinical trials that included 199 unique compounds met our inclusion criteria. The likelihood, or cumulative clinical trial success rate, that a new drug would pass all phases of clinical testing and be approved was found to be 11%, which is less than industry aggregate rates. Over half of the biomarkers used in NSCLC have not yet been approved by the Food and Drug Administration in any indication. Biomarker targeted therapies (62%) and receptor targeted therapies (31%) were found to have the highest success rates. The risk-adjusted cost for NSCLC clinical drug development was calculated to be U.S. $1.89 billion.
Biomarker use alone in this indication resulted in a sixfold increase in clinical trial success whereas receptor targeted therapies did so by almost threefold. Physicians who enroll patients in NSCLC trials should prioritize their participation in clinical trial programs that use biomarkers and receptor targeted therapies.
本研究分析了 1998 年至 2012 年 1 月期间非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)药物开发过程中临床试验失败的风险。我们还寻找了影响 NSCLC 临床试验风险的因素。
通过 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov 及其他公开资源中的试验披露,对 NSCLC 药物开发进行了研究。如果化合物在 1998 年之前开始进行 I 期临床测试、未使用与治疗相关的终点、或未在 NSCLC 中完成 I 期试验,则将其排除在分析之外。分析针对治疗适应症、化合物分类和作用机制进行。
有 676 项临床试验包含 199 种独特的化合物符合我们的纳入标准。一种新药通过所有临床测试阶段并获得批准的可能性,或累积临床试验成功率,被发现为 11%,低于行业综合比率。在 NSCLC 中使用的一半以上的生物标志物尚未在任何适应症中获得食品和药物管理局的批准。生物标志物靶向治疗(62%)和受体靶向治疗(31%)被发现具有最高的成功率。计算得出 NSCLC 临床药物开发的风险调整成本为 18.9 亿美元。
在该适应症中,仅使用生物标志物可使临床试验成功率提高六倍,而受体靶向治疗则提高了近三倍。在 NSCLC 试验中招募患者的医生应优先考虑参与使用生物标志物和受体靶向治疗的临床试验项目。