Suppr超能文献

采用超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定水果、谷物、香料和油籽中农药残留和真菌毒素的提取方法的评价。

Critical assessment of extraction methods for the simultaneous determination of pesticide residues and mycotoxins in fruits, cereals, spices and oil seeds employing ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

机构信息

Institute of Chemical Technology, Prague, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, Technicka 3, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Chromatogr A. 2012 Nov 2;1262:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.08.097. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

Abstract

This study addresses a current trend in chemical food safety control represented by an effort to integrate analyses of various groups of food contaminants/toxicants into a single, high-throughput method. The choice of optimal sample preparation step is one of the key conditions to achieve good performance characteristics. In this context, we investigated the possibility to expand the scope of the three multi-analyte extraction procedures employed earlier in other studies for rapid isolation of either pesticides or mycotoxins from plant matrices. Following procedures were tested: A - aqueous acetonitrile extraction followed by partition (QuEChERS-like method), B - aqueous acetonitrile extraction, and C - pure acetonitrile extraction. On the list of target analytes, we had 288 pesticides (including 'troublesome' acidic, basic and base-sensitive compounds) together with 38 mycotoxins (including all EU regulated ones and many 'emerging' toxins on the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) list). The matrices selected for the experiments, apple baby food, wheat flour, spices and sunflower seeds, represented various composition categories in terms of moisture, fat and extractable compounds (e.g. pigments and essential oils) content. In preliminary experiments, acceptable recoveries (70-120%) for most of analytes were obtained by the analysis of spiked matrices, regardless which extraction procedure was used. However, when analysing dry samples with incurred pesticide residues/mycotoxins, the method C did not enable efficient extraction of some common contaminants. Procedure A, thanks to a higher matrix equivalent compared to the method B and relatively less pronounced matrix effects, enabled lower quantification limits for all analyte/matrix combinations, with the exception of polar mycotoxins and/or pesticides. Higher recoveries for the latter group of analytes could be achieved by the method B; on the other hand, extraction efficiency of non-polar pesticides from fatty matrix was rather poor by this method.

摘要

本研究针对当前化学食品安全控制的一个趋势,即努力将各种食品污染物/毒物的分析整合到单一的高通量方法中。选择最佳的样品制备步骤是实现良好性能特征的关键条件之一。在这种情况下,我们研究了扩大早期在其他研究中用于从植物基质中快速分离农药或霉菌毒素的三种多分析物提取程序的范围的可能性。测试了以下程序:A - 水-乙腈提取后分配(类似于 QuEChERS 的方法),B - 水-乙腈提取,C - 纯乙腈提取。在目标分析物列表中,我们有 288 种农药(包括“麻烦”的酸性、碱性和碱性敏感化合物)以及 38 种霉菌毒素(包括所有欧盟规定的以及欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)列出的许多“新兴”毒素)。用于实验的基质,苹果婴儿食品、小麦粉、香料和葵花籽,代表了不同的组成类别,涉及水分、脂肪和可提取化合物(例如色素和精油)的含量。在初步实验中,通过分析加标基质,使用任何提取程序均可获得大多数分析物的可接受回收率(70-120%)。然而,当分析带有农药残留/霉菌毒素的干样品时,方法 C 无法有效提取一些常见污染物。方法 A 由于与方法 B 相比基质等效性更高,并且相对较少的基质效应,使得所有分析物/基质组合的定量下限更低,极性霉菌毒素和/或农药除外。方法 B 可实现后者组分析物的更高回收率;另一方面,该方法从高脂肪基质中提取非极性农药的效率较差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验