Suppr超能文献

铒铬:YSGG 激光对 V 类复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响。

Er,Cr:YSGG laser influence on microleakage of class V composite resin restorations.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Sep;28(5):1257-62. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1200-6. Epub 2012 Sep 26.

Abstract

One of the most challenging issues following restoration is microleakage. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser with and without acid etching on microleakage of class V composite restorations. A total of 68 human intact premolars were selected, disinfected, and randomly allocated to four experimental groups (n = 16) as well as positive and negative controls (n = 2 each). Dimensionally, similar class V cavities were prepared on buccal surface of each tooth under the following conditions: group 1, bur cavity preparation and chemical etching (BE); group 2, bur cavity preparation and Er,Cr:YSGG laser conditioning (BLc); group 3, Er,Cr:YSGG laser cavity preparation and chemical etching (LE); and group 4, Er,Cr:YSGG laser cavity preparation and Er,Cr:YSGG laser conditioning (LLc). All samples were restored with composite. The teeth were sealed and immersed in 1 % methylene blue for 48 h before being sectioned. The microleakage evaluation was done under a stereomicroscope (×20). The leakage scores were recorded and Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical evaluations. The highest microleakage score was seen in gingival margins of group 4 (LLc) and the lowest in occlusal margins of group 3 (LE). The overall difference in leakage scores among the groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001) with gingival margins showing a significantly higher score than its occlusal counterparts (p < 0.001). It was noted that less microleakage could be achieved when cavities were prepared by laser compared to bur. In addition, less microleakage was seen in acid-etched cavities than laser-conditioned counterparts.

摘要

修复后最具挑战性的问题之一是微渗漏。本研究旨在探讨 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光联合酸蚀和不联合酸蚀对 V 类复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响。共选择 68 个人体完整前磨牙,消毒后随机分为四组(n=16),以及阳性和阴性对照组(n=2 个)。在以下条件下,在每个牙齿的颊面制备相似的 V 类腔:第 1 组,用车针制备腔并用化学酸蚀(BE);第 2 组,用车针制备腔并用 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光预处理(BLc);第 3 组,用 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光制备腔并用化学酸蚀(LE);第 4 组,用 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光制备腔并用 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光预处理(LLc)。所有样本均用复合树脂修复。牙齿密封后用 1%亚甲蓝浸泡 48 小时,然后切片。在立体显微镜(×20)下进行微渗漏评估。记录渗漏评分,并进行 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney 检验进行统计评估。第 4 组(LLc)的龈缘微渗漏评分最高,第 3 组(LE)的牙合面边缘微渗漏评分最低。各组间渗漏评分的总体差异具有统计学意义(p<0.001),龈缘的评分显著高于牙合面(p<0.001)。结果表明,与车针相比,激光制备的窝洞渗漏较少。此外,酸蚀窝洞的微渗漏明显少于激光处理的窝洞。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验