Suppr超能文献

急诊医师能否预测严重程度和误工时间?

Can emergency physicians predict severity and time away from work?

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Occup Med (Lond). 2012 Dec;62(8):648-50. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqs174. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency and primary care physicians are often asked to estimate patients' likely duration of sickness absence or temporary disability following work-related injury or illness. However, return to work is a complex interaction of multiple factors and often difficult to predict accurately.

AIMS

To compare physician estimates of expected time away from work and severity of injury, made at the time of the initial presentation, with actual duration of temporary disability following work-related shoulder or knee injury.

METHODS

Patients aged 18-65 with work-related shoulder or knee injuries who attended one of three Edmonton Emergency Departments were recruited. For each participant the treating physician made an estimate of severity and expected time before they would return to their work. This was compared with information on actual temporary disability (TDdays) obtained from the Alberta Workers' Compensation Board (WCB) data.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 443 (88%) of 501 patients were enrolled into the study; however, only 177 (35%) agreed to linking their data with WCB. Median TDdays increased with the physicians' estimates of both severity and likely temporary disability. Physicians tended to underestimate time off work for those with long duration of TDdays, but overestimated this for those with short durations.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency physicians' estimates of expected lost work time and severity of injury were correlated with actual temporary disability, although their accuracy was fairly low. Further work to define why differences between estimated and actual temporary disability occur could help physicians and others planning return to work.

摘要

背景

急诊和初级保健医生经常被要求估计患者在与工作相关的伤害或疾病后可能的病假或临时残疾持续时间。然而,重返工作岗位是一个多因素复杂的相互作用,往往难以准确预测。

目的

比较医生在初次就诊时对预计工作时间和受伤严重程度的估计,与与工作相关的肩或膝伤后实际临时残疾持续时间。

方法

招募了在埃德蒙顿三个急诊部门就诊的年龄在 18-65 岁之间的与工作相关的肩或膝伤患者。对于每个参与者,治疗医生都对严重程度和预计返回工作岗位的时间进行了估计。这与从艾伯塔省工人赔偿委员会 (WCB) 数据中获得的实际临时残疾 (TDdays) 信息进行了比较。

结果

在研究期间,501 名患者中有 443 名(88%)被纳入研究;然而,只有 177 名(35%)同意将他们的数据与 WCB 关联。TDdays 的中位数随着医生对严重程度和可能的临时残疾的估计而增加。医生往往会低估那些 TDDays 较长的人请假时间,但对那些 TDDays 较短的人则高估了。

结论

急诊医生对预计工作损失时间和受伤严重程度的估计与实际临时残疾相关,尽管准确性相当低。进一步研究导致估计和实际临时残疾之间差异的原因可能有助于医生和其他计划重返工作岗位的人。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验