• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性前列腺切除术对老年高危前列腺癌是一种有效的治疗选择吗?

Is radical prostatectomy a useful therapeutic option for high-risk prostate cancer in older men?

机构信息

Martini Clinic, Prostate Cancer Centre, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2012;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-S1-04.

DOI:10.1634/theoncologist.2012-S1-04
PMID:23015679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3593781/
Abstract

Prostate cancer affects a high proportion of men over 70 years of age, who are likely to have high-risk disease and a substantial risk of prostate-cancer-specific death. With life expectancy increasing worldwide, the burden of prostate cancer is also expected to rise. Thus, effective management of this high-risk senior patient group is increasingly important. Radical prostatectomy can increase survival and decrease the risk of metastatic progression. Postsurgery complications are affected more by comorbidity than by age. In patients without comorbidities, surgery is associated with a low risk of mortality. Advanced age may increase the likelihood of incontinence following radical prostatectomy, but patients with higher risk disease are no more likely to experience this complication compared with lower risk groups. Treatment decisions should be made after considering the health status and life expectancy of the individual patient. If eligible, the patient should be offered radical prostatectomy as a potentially curative treatment, without a rigid restriction to a certain chronological age.

摘要

前列腺癌影响了很大一部分 70 岁以上的男性,这些患者可能患有高危疾病,并且存在相当大的前列腺癌特异性死亡风险。随着全球预期寿命的增加,前列腺癌的负担预计也将增加。因此,有效管理这一高危老年患者群体变得日益重要。根治性前列腺切除术可以提高生存率并降低转移进展的风险。术后并发症更多地受到合并症的影响,而不是年龄的影响。在没有合并症的患者中,手术与死亡率低相关。高龄可能会增加根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的可能性,但与低危组相比,高危疾病患者发生这种并发症的可能性并不更高。应在考虑个体患者的健康状况和预期寿命后做出治疗决策。如果符合条件,应将根治性前列腺切除术作为一种潜在的治愈性治疗方法提供给患者,而不是严格限制在特定的年龄。

相似文献

1
Is radical prostatectomy a useful therapeutic option for high-risk prostate cancer in older men?根治性前列腺切除术对老年高危前列腺癌是一种有效的治疗选择吗?
Oncologist. 2012;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-S1-04.
2
Radical prostatectomy outcome in men 65 years old or older with low risk prostate cancer.65 岁及以上低危前列腺癌患者行根治性前列腺切除术的疗效。
J Urol. 2012 May;187(5):1620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.072. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
3
Cause of Mortality after Radical Prostatectomy and the Impact of Comorbidity in Men with Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institutional Study in Korea.前列腺癌根治术后的死亡原因及合并症对前列腺癌男性患者的影响:韩国的一项多机构研究
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Oct;52(4):1242-1250. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.286. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
4
Considering the role of radical prostatectomy in 21st century prostate cancer care.考虑在 21 世纪前列腺癌治疗中根治性前列腺切除术的作用。
Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Mar;17(3):177-188. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0287-y. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
5
Survival benefit of radical prostatectomy in patients with localized prostate cancer: estimations of the number needed to treat according to tumor and patient characteristics.根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的生存获益:根据肿瘤和患者特征估计的需要治疗的人数。
J Urol. 2012 Jul;188(1):73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 May 12.
6
Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer - 29-Year Follow-up.根治性前列腺切除术与前列腺癌观察等待-29 年随访结果。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2319-2329. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1807801.
7
Management of localised prostate cancer: watchful waiting, surgery or radiation therapy, depending on the natural course, which is often relatively slow.局限性前列腺癌的治疗:根据其自然病程(通常进展相对缓慢),可选择观察等待、手术或放射治疗。
Prescrire Int. 2012 Oct;21(131):242-8.
8
Undertreatment of Men in Their Seventies with High-risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer.七十岁以上高危局限性前列腺癌男性治疗不足。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jul;68(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.026. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
9
A Multi-institutional Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes in 106 Men Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy for Distant Metastatic Prostate Cancer at Presentation.106 例初诊时远处转移性前列腺癌行根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期结局的多机构分析。
Eur Urol. 2016 May;69(5):788-94. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.023. Epub 2015 May 30.
10
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.腹腔镜及机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Tools for Optimizing Therapeutic Decision-Making in Prostate Cancer: A Five-Year Retrospective Analysis.优化前列腺癌治疗决策的临床工具:一项五年回顾性分析
Life (Basel). 2024 Jun 30;14(7):838. doi: 10.3390/life14070838.
2
snRNAs from Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Have the Potential to Serve as Prognostic Factors for Clinical Recurrence after Biochemical Recurrence in Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer.来自根治性前列腺切除术标本的小核仁核糖核酸有潜力作为高危前列腺癌患者生化复发后临床复发的预后因素。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 1;16(9):1757. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091757.
3
The Dilemma of Misclassification Rates in Senior Patients With Prostate Cancer, Who Were Treated With Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Patient Counseling and Diagnostics.接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的老年前列腺癌患者分类错误率的困境:对患者咨询和诊断的影响
Front Surg. 2022 Feb 16;9:838477. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.838477. eCollection 2022.
4
The Siconolfi step test: a valid and reliable assessment of cardiopulmonary fitness in older men with prostate cancer.西科诺尔菲台阶试验:对老年前列腺癌男性心肺适能的有效且可靠评估。
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2019 Jan 10;16:1. doi: 10.1186/s11556-018-0207-9. eCollection 2019.
5
Physician role in physical activity for African-American males undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.医生在接受前列腺癌根治术的非裔美国男性体育活动中的作用。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Apr;25(4):1151-1158. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3505-7. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术与观察等待治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113162.
2
Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后的辅助放疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD007234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007234.pub2.
3
Surgery for high-risk localized prostate cancer.高危局限性前列腺癌的外科治疗。
Ther Adv Urol. 2011 Aug;3(4):173-82. doi: 10.1177/1756287211418722.
4
Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial.根治性前列腺切除术或观察等待后长期生活质量结局:斯堪的纳维亚前列腺癌群组 4 随机试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):891-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70162-0. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
5
Cancer-specific and other-cause mortality after radical prostatectomy versus observation in patients with prostate cancer: competing-risks analysis of a large North American population-based cohort.根治性前列腺切除术与观察治疗前列腺癌患者的癌症特异性和其他原因死亡率:基于大型北美人群队列的竞争风险分析。
Eur Urol. 2011 Nov;60(5):920-30. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.039. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
6
Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy versus external-beam radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.高危前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术与外照射放疗的长期生存比较。
Cancer. 2011 Jul 1;117(13):2883-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25900. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
7
Mortality among men with locally advanced prostate cancer managed with noncurative intent: a nationwide study in PCBaSe Sweden.非治愈性治疗局部晚期前列腺癌男性患者的死亡率:瑞典 PCBaSe 全国性研究。
Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):554-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.047. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
8
Impact of age at diagnosis on prostate cancer treatment and survival.诊断时年龄对前列腺癌治疗和生存的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 10;29(2):235-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.2075. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
9
Pathological results and rates of treatment failure in high-risk prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后高危前列腺癌患者的病理结果和治疗失败率。
BJU Int. 2011 Mar;107(5):765-770. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09594.x. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
10
Trends in the treatment of localized prostate cancer using supplemented cancer registry data.利用补充癌症登记数据评估局限性前列腺癌的治疗趋势。
BJU Int. 2011 Feb;107(4):576-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09514.x. Epub 2010 Aug 24.