Martiniklinik am Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Ther Adv Urol. 2011 Aug;3(4):173-82. doi: 10.1177/1756287211418722.
Treatment of men with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remains challenging for urologists. The complex natural history of high-risk PCa and the lack of specific and accurate definitions for high-risk disease impede treatment decision making. Historically, surgery in this patient group has been avoided based on the perception of ostensibly higher complication rates associated with inferior functional and oncological outcomes. To date, no randomized data comparing different therapy approaches have been made available. Several investigators have reported that continence rates in patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) for high-risk disease seem to be unaffected. Similarly, in a large proportion of these men, a nerve-sparing procedure can be performed without a significant negative impact on surgical margin rates and with comparable potency results. Moreover, extended pelvic lymph node dissection (EPLND) contributes to accurate pathological staging with a marginal effect on perioperative morbidity. With regards to the benefits of RP on local recurrence and cure rates, realistic expectations regarding the success of RP alone or in the context of a multimodal approach should be provided during patient counseling.
治疗高危前列腺癌(PCa)的男性仍然是泌尿科医生面临的挑战。高危 PCa 的复杂自然病史以及缺乏高危疾病的具体和准确定义,阻碍了治疗决策的制定。从历史上看,由于担心与功能和肿瘤学结果较差相关的并发症发生率较高,手术在该患者群体中被避免。迄今为止,尚无比较不同治疗方法的随机数据。一些研究人员报告称,高危疾病患者接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后的控尿率似乎没有受到影响。同样,在这些男性中的很大一部分人中,可以进行保留神经的手术,而不会对手术切缘率产生重大负面影响,并且具有可比的勃起功能结果。此外,扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(EPLND)有助于进行准确的病理分期,对围手术期发病率的影响很小。关于 RP 在局部复发和治愈率方面的益处,在对患者进行咨询时,应提供关于 RP 单独或在多模态治疗背景下成功的现实期望。