Suppr超能文献

髌股关节疼痛综合征的前瞻性预测因素:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Prospective Predictors of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Long Island University-Brooklyn Campus, Brooklyn, New York.

出版信息

Sports Health. 2012 Mar;4(2):115-20. doi: 10.1177/1941738111432097.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is one of the most common overuse injuries.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the collective evidence of predisposing factors to PFPS.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (1960-June 2010), EMBASE (1980-June 2010), and CINAHL (1982-June 2010).

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if patients were asymptomatic at baseline testing (free of PFPS) and were prospectively followed for the development of the disorder. Only studies that assessed at least 1 variable that can be measured at a typical clinic were included. After duplicates were removed, 973 studies were assessed from their titles or abstracts, 20 from the full text, and from these, 7 met the inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted for age, weight, height, sample size, patient type (military vs civilian), follow-up periods, diagnostic methods, and diagnostic criteria. Means and standard deviations were extracted for all outcome variables.

RESULTS

Meta-analyses were performed for height, weight, leanness, Q angle, number of sit-ups, knee extension strength, and peak knee valgus angle during landing. Lower knee extension strength was the only variable that was predictive of PFPS (P < 0.01). Other variables that were identified as predictive of PFPS by single studies were vertical jump, push-ups, knee flexion and hip abduction strength, thumb-to-forearm flexibility, quadriceps and gastrocnemius flexibility, genu varum, navicular drop, knee valgus moment at initial contact during landing, social support, and palliative reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that anthropometric variables are not associated with PFPS, while knee extension strength deficits appear to be predictors of PFPS.

摘要

髌股疼痛综合征(PFPS)是最常见的过度使用损伤之一。

目的

评估 PFPS 的易患因素的综合证据。

资料来源

MEDLINE(1960 年-2010 年 6 月)、EMBASE(1980 年-2010 年 6 月)和 CINAHL(1982 年-2010 年 6 月)。

研究选择

如果患者在基线测试时无症状(无 PFPS)并前瞻性随访以确定疾病的发展,则纳入研究。仅纳入评估至少 1 个可在典型诊所测量的变量的研究。去除重复项后,从标题或摘要中评估了 973 项研究,从全文中评估了 20 项研究,其中 7 项符合纳入标准。

资料提取

提取年龄、体重、身高、样本量、患者类型(军人与平民)、随访期、诊断方法和诊断标准的数据。提取所有结果变量的均值和标准差。

结果

对身高、体重、消瘦、Q 角、仰卧起坐次数、膝关节伸展力量、落地时峰值膝外翻角度进行了荟萃分析。只有膝关节伸展力量是预测 PFPS 的唯一变量(P < 0.01)。其他被单项研究确定为预测 PFPS 的变量包括垂直跳跃、俯卧撑、膝关节和髋关节外展力量、拇指到前臂的柔韧性、股四头肌和腓肠肌柔韧性、膝内翻、舟骨下降、落地时初始接触时的膝外翻力矩、社会支持和姑息反应。

结论

似乎人体测量学变量与 PFPS 无关,而膝关节伸展力量不足似乎是 PFPS 的预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8796/3435911/328a692e0b97/10.1177_1941738111432097-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验