Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Am J Med. 2012 Dec;125(12):1188-1194.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.01.034. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
Measures of physical performance are regarded as useful objective clinical tools to estimate survival in elderly people. However, oldest old people, aged 85 years or more, are underrepresented in earlier studies and frequently unable to perform functional tests. We studied the association of gait speed and survival in a cohort of oldest old people and the association of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living by questionnaire and survival as an alternative prognostic marker of survival.
The Leiden 85-plus Study was used, a prospective population-based study with a follow-up period of 12 years. The study comprised 599 participants all aged 85 years at baseline. Survival rate was the measurement.
At age 85 years, 73 participants (12.2%) did not perform the walking test. Gait speed faster than 0.8 m/s was present in only 48 participants (9%), and gait speed faster than 1.0 m/s was present in 10 participants (1.9%). Risk for all-cause mortality was higher in participants with slow gait speed after 2 and 12 years of follow-up (hazard ratio [HR], 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-4.75; P<.001; and HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.61-2.59; P=.100, respectively). Significance was lost after adjustment for common confounders. Poor Instrumental Activities of Daily Living ability was associated with an increased risk of mortality after 2 and 12 years of follow-up (HR, 6.11; 95% CI, 3.44-10.87; P<.001; and HR, 2.75; 95% CI, 2.22-3.40; P<.001, respectively). Adjustment for possible confounders attenuated the relation but remained significant.
The cutoff points for gait speed in oldest old people need to be reevaluated. In oldest old people aged 85 years, slow gait speed (≤0.40 m/s in women and ≤0.45 m/s in men) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living disability are both predictors of survival. Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living could be a better tool for short- and long-term prognostication of survival in oldest old people.
身体机能的衡量标准被认为是一种有用的客观临床工具,可用于评估老年人的生存率。然而,在早期的研究中,最年长的老年人(85 岁及以上)的代表性不足,并且他们经常无法进行功能测试。我们研究了在最年长的老年人队列中,步速与生存率的关系,以及通过问卷得出的工具性日常生活活动与生存率之间的关系,以作为生存率的替代预后标志物。
本研究使用了莱顿 85 岁以上研究,这是一项前瞻性的基于人群的研究,随访时间为 12 年。该研究共纳入了 599 名基线年龄为 85 岁的参与者。生存率是测量指标。
在 85 岁时,有 73 名参与者(12.2%)无法进行步行测试。仅有 48 名参与者(9%)的步速超过 0.8m/s,10 名参与者(1.9%)的步速超过 1.0m/s。在随访 2 年和 12 年后,步速较慢的参与者全因死亡率更高(风险比 [HR],2.66;95%置信区间 [CI],1.49-4.75;P<.001;和 HR,2.04;95% CI,1.61-2.59;P=.100)。在调整常见混杂因素后,这种相关性不再具有统计学意义。较差的工具性日常生活活动能力与随访 2 年和 12 年后的死亡率升高相关(HR,6.11;95% CI,3.44-10.87;P<.001;和 HR,2.75;95% CI,2.22-3.40;P<.001)。调整可能的混杂因素后,这种关系有所减弱,但仍具有统计学意义。
最年长的老年人的步速截断点需要重新评估。在 85 岁的最年长老年人中,较慢的步速(女性≤0.40m/s,男性≤0.45m/s)和工具性日常生活活动能力障碍都是生存率的预测因素。工具性日常生活活动的评估可能是预测最年长老年人短期和长期生存率的更好工具。