CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Med Intensiva. 2012 Nov;36(8):571-5. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2012.08.010. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
In 1994, an American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) formalized the criteria for the diagnosis of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although that definition is simple to apply in the clinical setting, it has been challenged over the years in several studies since the assessment of the oxygenation defect does not require standardized ventilatory support. We were the first to propose new guidelines, based on a specific, standard method of evaluating oxygenation status, a proposal that was later advocated by others. To address the limitations of the AECC definition, a modified ARDS definition has been proposed by a task force panel of experts, referred to as the Berlin Defintion, using a terminology similar to that we previously proposed. However, that proposal has several methodological flaws. Since all ARDS patients start off with terrible oxygenation, the Berlin Definition offers no room for stratifying and identifyng true ARDS patients since there is no further re-evaluation of the hypoxemia under standard ventilator setting in a specific time period. In this Point of View, we review the history of the definition of ARDS and discussed the methodological concerns regarding adopting this new, revised ARDS definition.
1994 年,欧美共识会议(AECC)正式确定了急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的诊断标准。尽管该定义在临床环境中易于应用,但多年来,由于氧合缺陷的评估不需要标准化的通气支持,因此在几项研究中受到了挑战。我们是第一个基于特定的、标准化的氧合状态评估方法提出新指南的人,这一建议后来也得到了其他人的支持。为了解决 AECC 定义的局限性,一个专家工作组提出了一个改良的 ARDS 定义,称为柏林定义,该定义使用了类似于我们之前提出的术语。然而,该建议存在几个方法学上的缺陷。由于所有 ARDS 患者一开始的氧合都很差,柏林定义没有为分层和识别真正的 ARDS 患者提供空间,因为在特定时间段内,在标准呼吸机设置下没有进一步重新评估低氧血症。在这篇观点文章中,我们回顾了 ARDS 定义的历史,并讨论了采用这一新的、修订后的 ARDS 定义的方法学问题。