Department of Management, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois 60605, USA.
Acad Med. 2012 Nov;87(11):1622-31. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826dbfd1.
The work environment culture inhibits women's career success in academic medicine. The lack of clarity and consistency in the definition, measurement, and analysis of culture constrains current research on the topic. The authors addressed this gap by defining the construct of a culture conducive to women's academic success (CCWAS) and creating a measure (i.e., tool) to evaluate it.
First, the authors conducted a review of published literature, held focus groups, and consulted with subject matter experts to develop a measure of academic workplace culture for women. Then they developed and pilot-tested the measure with a convenience sample of women assistant professors. After refining the measure, they administered it, along with additional scales for validation, to 133 women assistant professors at the University of Pennsylvania. Finally, they conducted statistical analyses to explore the measure's nature and validity.
A CCWAS consists of four distinct, but related, dimensions: equal access, work-life balance, freedom from gender biases, and supportive leadership. The authors found evidence that women within departments/divisions agree on the supportiveness of their units but that substantial differences among units exist. The analyses provided strong evidence for the reliability and validity of their measure.
This report contributes to a growing understanding of women's academic medicine careers and provides a measure that researchers can use to assess the supportiveness of the culture for women assistant professors and that leaders can use to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the supportiveness of the environment for women faculty.
工作环境文化阻碍了女性在学术医学领域的职业成功。由于文化的定义、测量和分析缺乏明确性和一致性,限制了当前关于该主题的研究。作者通过定义有利于女性学术成功的文化结构(CCWAS)并创建评估该结构的工具来解决这一差距。
首先,作者对已发表的文献进行了审查,举行了焦点小组讨论,并咨询了主题专家,以开发一种针对女性的学术工作场所文化衡量标准。然后,他们使用女性助理教授的便利样本对该衡量标准进行了开发和试点测试。在对衡量标准进行改进后,他们在宾夕法尼亚大学的 133 名女性助理教授中同时实施了该衡量标准和其他验证性量表。最后,他们进行了统计分析,以探讨衡量标准的性质和有效性。
CCWAS 由四个不同但相关的维度组成:平等机会、工作与生活平衡、免受性别偏见的影响以及支持性领导。作者发现,部门/科室内部的女性对其单位的支持度有共识,但单位之间存在显著差异。分析结果为该衡量标准的可靠性和有效性提供了有力证据。
本报告有助于加深对女性学术医学职业的理解,并提供了一种衡量标准,研究人员可以使用该标准评估对女性助理教授的文化支持程度,领导者可以使用该标准评估旨在增加女性教职员工环境支持度的干预措施的有效性。