Carapinha René, McCracken Caitlin M, Warner Erica T, Hill Emorcia V, Reede Joan Y
1 Office for Diversity Inclusion and Community Partnership, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
2 Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 May;26(5):549-559. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6020. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
Gender inequalities in the careers of faculty in academic medicine could partially be attributed to an organizational climate that can exclude or be nonsupportive of women faculty. This study explores the climate for women faculty from a systems perspective at the organizational and individual levels based on the perceptions of women faculty. Race differences were also investigated.
Cross-sectional survey data from women faculty (N = 3127) at 13 purposively sampled medical schools and an institutional assessment of organizational characteristics were used. Organizational factors related to the climate for women were identified using bivariate statistics. The association between perceived climate for women and organizational characteristics, individual perceptions of the work environment and individual career, and personal characteristics with control variables were investigated using hierarchical linear regression models. Organizational effects by race/ethnicity were estimated using interaction terms.
The climate for women faculty varied across institutions and by classification as minority-serving institutions (MSIs). Respondent's report of existence of an office for women's affairs, trust in leadership, and satisfaction with mentoring were positively associated with the climate for women. Perceived workplace discrimination and work-family conflict were inversely associated with a positive climate. No race/ethnicity differences were observed in the multivariable analysis.
The climate for women faculty in academic medicine should not be regarded constant across organizations, specifically between MSIs and non-MSIs. Efforts to advance a positive climate for women could focus on improving trust in leadership, increasing support for structures/offices for women, and mitigating perceived discrimination and work-family conflict.
学术医学领域教师职业中的性别不平等现象,部分可归因于一种可能排斥或不支持女性教师的组织氛围。本研究基于女性教师的认知,从组织和个体层面的系统视角探讨女性教师所处的氛围。同时也调查了种族差异。
使用了来自13所经目的抽样的医学院校的女性教师(N = 3127)的横断面调查数据,以及对组织特征的机构评估。使用双变量统计方法确定与女性氛围相关的组织因素。使用分层线性回归模型研究女性感知氛围与组织特征、工作环境和个人职业的个体认知以及控制变量的个人特征之间的关联。使用交互项估计种族/族裔的组织效应。
女性教师的氛围因机构不同以及是否为少数族裔服务机构(MSIs)而有所差异。受访者报告存在妇女事务办公室、对领导的信任以及对指导的满意度与女性氛围呈正相关。感知到的职场歧视和工作 - 家庭冲突与积极氛围呈负相关。在多变量分析中未观察到种族/族裔差异。
学术医学领域女性教师的氛围在不同组织间,特别是在MSIs和非MSIs之间不应被视为一成不变。营造有利于女性的积极氛围的努力可集中在提高对领导的信任、增加对女性结构/办公室的支持,以及减轻感知到的歧视和工作 - 家庭冲突上。