Suppr超能文献

脊髓麻醉期间的镇静:丙泊酚与咪达唑仑的比较。

Sedation during spinal anaesthesia: comparison of propofol and midazolam.

作者信息

Wilson E, David A, MacKenzie N, Grant I S

机构信息

Department of Anaesthetics, Ninewells Teaching Hospital, Dundee.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1990 Jan;64(1):48-52. doi: 10.1093/bja/64.1.48.

Abstract

Propofol and midazolam were compared in 40 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery under spinal anaesthesia. An infusion of either 1% propofol or 0.1% midazolam was given at a rate adjusted to maintain a similar level of sedation. The mean time to reach this required level was similar in both groups. Quality and ease of control of sedation were good in all patients. A mean infusion rate of 3.63 mg kg-1 h-1 was required for propofol and 0.26 mg kg-1 h-1 for midazolam. Immediate recovery, as judged by ability to open eyes and recall date of birth, was significantly more rapid following propofol (P less than 0.001). Similarly, restoration of higher mental function was significantly faster following propofol, measured by choice reaction time and critical flicker fusion threshold. Amnesia for the immediate postoperative period was significantly greater after midazolam (P = 0.0001).

摘要

在40例接受脊髓麻醉下行骨科手术的患者中,对丙泊酚和咪达唑仑进行了比较。以调整后的速率输注1%丙泊酚或0.1%咪达唑仑,以维持相似的镇静水平。两组达到该所需水平的平均时间相似。所有患者的镇静质量和控制难易程度均良好。丙泊酚的平均输注速率为3.63 mg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹,咪达唑仑为0.26 mg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹。根据睁眼能力和回忆出生日期判断,丙泊酚给药后立即恢复明显更快(P<0.001)。同样,通过选择反应时间和临界闪烁融合阈值测量,丙泊酚给药后高级心理功能的恢复明显更快。咪达唑仑给药后术后即刻的遗忘作用明显更强(P = 0.0001)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验