Wilson E, David A, MacKenzie N, Grant I S
Department of Anaesthetics, Ninewells Teaching Hospital, Dundee.
Br J Anaesth. 1990 Jan;64(1):48-52. doi: 10.1093/bja/64.1.48.
Propofol and midazolam were compared in 40 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery under spinal anaesthesia. An infusion of either 1% propofol or 0.1% midazolam was given at a rate adjusted to maintain a similar level of sedation. The mean time to reach this required level was similar in both groups. Quality and ease of control of sedation were good in all patients. A mean infusion rate of 3.63 mg kg-1 h-1 was required for propofol and 0.26 mg kg-1 h-1 for midazolam. Immediate recovery, as judged by ability to open eyes and recall date of birth, was significantly more rapid following propofol (P less than 0.001). Similarly, restoration of higher mental function was significantly faster following propofol, measured by choice reaction time and critical flicker fusion threshold. Amnesia for the immediate postoperative period was significantly greater after midazolam (P = 0.0001).
在40例接受脊髓麻醉下行骨科手术的患者中,对丙泊酚和咪达唑仑进行了比较。以调整后的速率输注1%丙泊酚或0.1%咪达唑仑,以维持相似的镇静水平。两组达到该所需水平的平均时间相似。所有患者的镇静质量和控制难易程度均良好。丙泊酚的平均输注速率为3.63 mg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹,咪达唑仑为0.26 mg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹。根据睁眼能力和回忆出生日期判断,丙泊酚给药后立即恢复明显更快(P<0.001)。同样,通过选择反应时间和临界闪烁融合阈值测量,丙泊酚给药后高级心理功能的恢复明显更快。咪达唑仑给药后术后即刻的遗忘作用明显更强(P = 0.0001)。