Universidad Nacional Aut6noma de Mexico,Queretaro, Mexico.
Rev Neurosci. 2012;23(5-6):501-8. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2012-0061.
Most of the work related to the neurobiological basis of memory has been guided by the memory consolidation theory, which was derived from the seminal work of Miiller and Pilzecker that was published over a century ago. This theory proposes that the transfer from short- to long-term memory is mediated by a process called consolidation,and while consolidation is taking place, the information to be stored is in a labile state. A great deal of experimentation has given strong support to this proposal,as it has been found repeatedly that interference with neural activity shortly after a learning experience impedes durable retention of that experience. A growing body of evidence, however, indicates that intense emotional experiences prevent memory loss induced by amnesic treatments,even when these treatments are administered intracerebrally shortly after the learning experience. This evidence implies that the memory consolidation theory cannot account for long-term memory formation when neural activity is disrupted while consolidation should be taking place, and it calls for new hypotheses to account for these findings.
大多数与记忆的神经生物学基础相关的工作都受到记忆巩固理论的指导,该理论源自一个多世纪前 Muller 和 Pilzecker 的开创性工作。该理论提出,从短期记忆到长期记忆的转移是由一个称为巩固的过程介导的,而在巩固过程中,要存储的信息处于不稳定状态。大量实验为这一假说提供了强有力的支持,因为人们反复发现,在学习经历后不久干扰神经活动会阻碍对该经历的持久记忆。然而,越来越多的证据表明,强烈的情绪体验可以防止遗忘性治疗引起的记忆丧失,即使这些治疗是在学习经历后不久在脑内给予的。这一证据意味着,当巩固过程应该进行时,神经活动受到干扰,记忆巩固理论无法解释长期记忆的形成,因此需要新的假设来解释这些发现。