Ferreira T L, Shammah-Lagnado S J, Bueno O F A, Moreira K M, Fornari R V, Oliveira M G M
Department of Psychobiology, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Napoleão de Barros, 925, CEP 04024-002, São Paulo, Brazil.
Neuroscience. 2008 Apr 22;153(1):84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.02.013. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
The dorsal striatum (DS) is involved in various forms of learning and memory such as procedural learning, habit learning, reward-association and emotional learning. We have previously reported that bilateral DS lesions disrupt tone fear conditioning (TFC), but not contextual fear conditioning (CFC) [Ferreira TL, Moreira KM, Ikeda DC, Bueno OFA, Oliveira MGM (2003) Effects of dorsal striatum lesions in tone fear conditioning and contextual fear conditioning. Brain Res 987:17-24]. To further elucidate the participation of DS in emotional learning, in the present study, we investigated the effects of bilateral pretest (postraining) electrolytic DS lesions on TFC. Given the well-acknowledged role of the amygdala in emotional learning, we also examined a possible cooperation between DS and the amygdala in TFC, by using asymmetrical electrolytic lesions, consisting of a unilateral lesion of the central amygdaloid nucleus (CeA) combined to a contralateral DS lesion. The results show that pre-test bilateral DS lesions disrupt TFC responses, suggesting that DS plays a role in the expression of TFC. More importantly, rats with asymmetrical pre-training lesions were impaired in TFC, but not in CFC tasks. This result was confirmed with muscimol asymmetrical microinjections in DS and CeA, which reversibly inactivate these structures. On the other hand, similar pretest lesions as well as unilateral electrolytic lesions of CeA and DS in the same hemisphere did not affect TFC. Possible anatomical substrates underlying the observed effects are proposed. Overall, the present results underscore that other routes, aside from the well-established CeA projections to the periaqueductal gray, may contribute to the acquisition/consolidation of the freezing response associated to a TFC task. It is suggested that CeA may presumably influence DS processing via a synaptic relay on dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra compacta and retrorubral nucleus. The present observations are also in line with other studies showing that TFC and CFC responses are mediated by different anatomical networks.
背侧纹状体(DS)参与多种形式的学习和记忆,如程序性学习、习惯学习、奖赏关联和情绪学习。我们之前报道过,双侧DS损伤会破坏音调恐惧条件反射(TFC),但不会破坏情境恐惧条件反射(CFC)[费雷拉TL,莫雷拉KM,池田DC,布埃诺OFA,奥利维拉MGM(2003年)背侧纹状体损伤对音调恐惧条件反射和情境恐惧条件反射的影响。《脑研究》987:17 - 24]。为了进一步阐明DS在情绪学习中的作用,在本研究中,我们研究了双侧预测试(训练后)电解性DS损伤对TFC的影响。鉴于杏仁核在情绪学习中已被充分认可的作用,我们还通过使用不对称电解损伤来研究DS与杏仁核在TFC中可能的协同作用,这种损伤包括中央杏仁核(CeA)的单侧损伤与对侧DS损伤相结合。结果表明,预测试双侧DS损伤会破坏TFC反应,这表明DS在TFC的表达中起作用。更重要的是,具有不对称预训练损伤的大鼠在TFC任务中受损,但在CFC任务中未受损。用蝇蕈醇对DS和CeA进行不对称微量注射证实了这一结果,该注射可使这些结构可逆性失活。另一方面,相同半球中类似的预测试损伤以及CeA和DS的单侧电解损伤并未影响TFC。我们提出了观察到的这些效应背后可能的解剖学基础。总体而言,目前的结果强调,除了已确立的CeA向导水管周围灰质的投射外,其他途径可能也有助于与TFC任务相关的僵住反应的习得/巩固。有人认为,CeA可能通过对黑质致密部和红核后核的多巴胺能神经元的突触中继来影响DS的处理。目前的观察结果也与其他研究一致,这些研究表明TFC和CFC反应是由不同的解剖学网络介导的。