Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA.
Conserv Biol. 2013 Feb;27(1):121-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01934.x. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
United States and Canadian governments have responded to legal requirements to reduce human-induced whale mortality via vessel strikes and entanglement in fishing gear by implementing a suite of regulatory actions. We analyzed the spatial and temporal patterns of mortality of large whales in the Northwest Atlantic (23.5°N to 48.0°N), 1970 through 2009, in the context of management changes. We used a multinomial logistic model fitted by maximum likelihood to detect trends in cause-specific mortalities with time. We compared the number of human-caused mortalities with U.S. federally established levels of potential biological removal (i.e., species-specific sustainable human-caused mortality). From 1970 through 2009, 1762 mortalities (all known) and serious injuries (likely fatal) involved 8 species of large whales. We determined cause of death for 43% of all mortalities; of those, 67% (502) resulted from human interactions. Entanglement in fishing gear was the primary cause of death across all species (n = 323), followed by natural causes (n = 248) and vessel strikes (n = 171). Established sustainable levels of mortality were consistently exceeded in 2 species by up to 650%. Probabilities of entanglement and vessel-strike mortality increased significantly from 1990 through 2009. There was no significant change in the local intensity of all or vessel-strike mortalities before and after 2003, the year after which numerous mitigation efforts were enacted. So far, regulatory efforts have not reduced the lethal effects of human activities to large whales on a population-range basis, although we do not exclude the possibility of success of targeted measures for specific local habitats that were not within the resolution of our analyses. It is unclear how shortfalls in management design or compliance relate to our findings. Analyses such as the one we conducted are crucial in critically evaluating wildlife-management decisions. The results of these analyses can provide managers with direction for modifying regulated measures and can be applied globally to mortality-driven conservation issues.
美国和加拿大政府为了应对因船只撞击和渔具缠绕导致的人为致鲸类死亡的法律要求,采取了一系列监管措施。我们分析了 1970 年至 2009 年北大西洋西北部(23.5°N 至 48.0°N)大型鲸类的死亡时空模式,以了解管理变化背景下的情况。我们使用最大似然法拟合的多项逻辑模型来检测特定原因死亡率随时间的变化趋势。我们将人为导致的死亡数量与美国联邦规定的潜在生物去除水平(即特定物种可持续的人为死亡)进行了比较。1970 年至 2009 年,共有 1762 起死亡(均为已知)和重伤(可能致命)事件涉及 8 种大型鲸类。我们确定了所有死亡事件中 43%的死因;其中,67%(502 起)是由人类活动引起的。在所有物种中,渔具缠绕是主要死因(n = 323),其次是自然原因(n = 248)和船只撞击(n = 171)。在 2 个物种中,建立的可持续死亡率水平一直被超过,最高可达 650%。1990 年至 2009 年,渔具缠绕和船只撞击死亡率的概率显著增加。2003 年之前和之后,所有船只撞击死亡率的局部强度都没有明显变化,2003 年之后实施了许多缓解措施。到目前为止,尽管我们不排除针对特定局部栖息地的有针对性措施可能取得成功的可能性,但监管工作并没有减少人类活动对大型鲸类种群范围的致命影响。管理设计或合规方面的不足与我们的发现有何关系尚不清楚。我们进行的此类分析对于批判性地评估野生动物管理决策至关重要。这些分析的结果可以为管理者提供修改受监管措施的方向,并可以在全球范围内应用于死亡率驱动的保护问题。