Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 155, Cerqueira César, 05403-000 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Respir Med. 2012 Dec;106(12):1794-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.08.023. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has been shown to increase diaphragm thickness. We evaluated the effect of IMT on mid-respiratory pressure (MRP) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and compared the results with a sham group.
Twenty consecutive patients (progressive loading group) and 9 controls (sham group) were included. All patients had end expiratory pressure (EEP) between 5 and 10 mmHg, underwent esophageal manometry and pulmonary function tests before and after 8 weeks of training, and used a threshold IMT twice daily. The threshold IMT was set at 30% of the maximal inspiratory pressure for the progressive loading group; while, the threshold for sham-treated patients was set at 7 cmH(2)O for the whole period.
There was an increase in MRP in 15 (75%) patients in the progressive loading group, with an average gain of 46.6% (p < 0.01), and in six (66%) patients in the sham group with a mean increase of 26.2% (p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.507). The EEP also increased compared with measurements before training (p < 0.01), but it did not differ between groups (p = 0.727).
IMT increased LES pressure in patients with GERD, in both the treatment and sham groups, after an eight-week program. Although there was no statistically significant difference between groups, suggesting the pressure increase in LES occurs regardless of the resistance load of the threshold IMT. These findings need to be confirmed in further studies with a larger sample.
0922/09.
呼吸肌训练(IMT)已被证明可以增加膈肌厚度。我们评估了 IMT 对胃食管反流病(GERD)和低血压下食管括约肌(LES)患者的中呼吸压(MRP)的影响,并与假手术组进行了比较。
连续纳入 20 例患者(递增负荷组)和 9 例对照(假手术组)。所有患者的呼气末压(EEP)均在 5-10mmHg 之间,在训练前和训练 8 周后进行食管测压和肺功能检查,并每天使用阈值 IMT 两次。递增负荷组的阈值 IMT 设定为最大吸气压力的 30%;而假手术组的阈值设定为 7cmH2O,整个期间不变。
递增负荷组 15 例(75%)患者的 MRP 增加,平均增加 46.6%(p<0.01),假手术组 6 例(66%)患者的 MRP 增加,平均增加 26.2%(p<0.01)。然而,两组之间没有显著差异(p=0.507)。EEP 与训练前的测量值相比也有所增加(p<0.01),但两组之间没有差异(p=0.727)。
经过 8 周的训练,GERD 患者的 IMT 增加了 LES 压力,无论是在治疗组还是假手术组。虽然两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异,但这表明 LES 压力的增加与阈值 IMT 的阻力负荷无关。这些发现需要在更大样本的进一步研究中得到证实。
0922/09。