• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

器械辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF):至少5年的临床和影像学结果随访

Instrumented Minimally Invasive Spinal-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF): Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up With Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes.

作者信息

Kim Jin-Sung, Jung Byungjoo, Lee Sang-Ho

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Wooridul Spine Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Jul;31(6):E302-E309. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827415cd.

DOI:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827415cd
PMID:23027364
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical and radiologic outcomes of the long-term results of instrumented minimally invasive spinal-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in unstable, single-level, low-grade, isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS) or degenerative spondylosis (DS) including degenerative spondylolisthesis, foraminal stenosis with central stenosis, degenerative disk disease, and recurrent disk herniation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

MIS-TLIF is a common surgical procedure to treat lumbar spondylolisthesis. However, there are no studies that have documented the long-term results of MIS-TLIF.

METHODS

Forty-four patients who had undergone instrumented MIS-TLIF between July 2003 and January 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. The visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, patient satisfaction rate, and the patient's return-to-work status were used to assess clinical and functional outcomes. Radiologic follow-up were carried out in patients to check for adjacent segmental degeneration (ASD). The plain radiographs, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, were used in all patients in last follow-up period.

RESULTS

The mean visual analog scale scores for back and leg pain decreased from 5.8 and 7 to 3.5 and 3.7, respectively, in the DS group (n=19) and from 6.8 and 6.9 to 1.8 and 2.0, respectively, in the IS group (n=25) (P<0.001). The mean Oswestry Disability Index scores improved from 61.7% to 21.5% in the DS group and from 53.9% to 16% in the IS group (P<0.001). Patient satisfaction rate was 80% and 81% in the DS and IS groups, respectively. Evidence of fusion was observed radiologically in 24 (96%) and 19 (100%) of the patients in the IS and the DS group, respectively, giving an overall fusion rate of 97.7% (43/44). The final ASD rate, observed using radiography, was 68.4% (13/19) in the DS and 40% (10/25) in the IS group. However, 15.8% (3/19) in the DS and 4% (1/25) in the IS group had symptoms associated with ASD.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes after instrumented MIS-TLIF in patients with unstable single-level spine are favorable.

摘要

研究设计

一项回顾性研究。

目的

确定器械辅助下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)治疗不稳定单节段、低度峡部裂型腰椎滑脱(IS)或退变性脊椎病(DS,包括退变性腰椎滑脱、伴有中央管狭窄的椎间孔狭窄、椎间盘退变疾病和复发性椎间盘突出症)的长期临床和影像学结果。

背景资料总结

MIS-TLIF是治疗腰椎滑脱的常见手术方式。然而,尚无研究记录MIS-TLIF的长期结果。

方法

对2003年7月至2005年1月期间接受器械辅助下MIS-TLIF手术的44例患者进行回顾性分析。采用视觉模拟评分法、Oswestry功能障碍指数、患者满意度及患者重返工作岗位情况评估临床和功能结果。对患者进行影像学随访以检查相邻节段退变(ASD)情况。在最后随访期对所有患者均行X线平片、计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像检查。

结果

DS组(n = 19)下腰痛和腿痛的视觉模拟评分均值分别从5.8和7降至3.5和3.7,IS组(n = 25)分别从6.8和6.9降至1.8和2.0(P < 0.001)。DS组Oswestry功能障碍指数评分均值从61.7%改善至21.5%,IS组从53.9%改善至16%(P < 0.001)。DS组和IS组患者满意度分别为80%和81%。IS组和DS组分别有24例(96%)和19例(100%)患者影像学检查显示融合征象,总体融合率为97.7%(43/44)。采用X线检查观察到的最终ASD发生率,DS组为68.4%(13/19),IS组为40%(10/25)。然而,DS组15.8%(3/19)和IS组4%(1/25)的患者出现与ASD相关的症状。

结论

器械辅助下MIS-TLIF治疗不稳定单节段脊柱疾病患者的长期临床和影像学结果良好。

相似文献

1
Instrumented Minimally Invasive Spinal-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF): Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up With Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes.器械辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF):至少5年的临床和影像学结果随访
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Jul;31(6):E302-E309. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827415cd.
2
Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.微创后路经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的长期耐久性:临床及影像学随访
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.
3
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱:峡部裂性腰椎滑脱与退变性腰椎滑脱的比较
World Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;84(5):1284-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
4
Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.L4-5腰椎滑脱的动态稳定:与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的比较及超过2年的随访
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Jan;40(1):E3. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15441.
5
Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.机器人辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与单节段腰椎滑脱症斜侧方腰椎体间融合术的疗效比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):2093-2101. doi: 10.1111/os.13151. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
6
Minimally invasive versus mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in managing low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与小切口经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗低度退变性腰椎滑脱症的比较。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Sep 12;166(1):365. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06231-7.
7
Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.L4-5椎体滑脱症中的放射学相邻节段退变:动态稳定与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Sep;29(3):250-258. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.SPINE17993. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
8
Decompression of Lumbar Central Spinal Canal Stenosis Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后腰椎中央椎管狭窄减压
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Oct 1;34(8):E439-E449. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001192.
9
Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.I度退行性腰椎滑脱症的微创与开放融合手术:质量结果数据库分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17188.
10
Comparison of 270-degree percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression under local anesthesia and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of geriatric lateral recess stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.局部麻醉下单侧入路经皮椎间孔镜 270°减压术与微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗老年退行性腰椎滑脱伴侧隐窝狭窄症的对比研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 9;18(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03676-x.

引用本文的文献

1
When can lumbar fusion be considered appropriate in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在复发性腰椎间盘突出症的治疗中,何时可认为腰椎融合术是合适的?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Brain Spine. 2025 May 30;5:104285. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104285. eCollection 2025.
2
The Degeneration of Paraspinal Muscles and Its Correlation with the Postoperative Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF).椎旁肌退变及其与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)术后临床疗效的相关性
J Pain Res. 2025 Apr 5;18:1827-1836. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S506153. eCollection 2025.
3
Postoperative cage migration and subsidence following TLIF surgery is not associated with bony fusion.
TLIF 手术后的椎间笼迁移和下沉与骨性融合无关。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 3;13(1):12597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38801-7.
4
Patient-Reported Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗退变性腰椎间盘疾病的患者报告结局:一项前瞻性对照队列研究。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Apr;15(2):257-264. doi: 10.4055/cios22250. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
5
Which Is Better in Clinical and Radiological Outcomes for Lumbar Degenerative Disease of Two Segments: MIS-TLIF or OPEN-TLIF?对于两节段腰椎退行性疾病,微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(OPEN-TLIF)在临床和影像学结果方面哪种更好?
J Pers Med. 2022 Nov 30;12(12):1977. doi: 10.3390/jpm12121977.
6
Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.新型微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合融合策略的有限元分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 May 11;2022:4266564. doi: 10.1155/2022/4266564. eCollection 2022.
7
Does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) influence functional outcomes and spinopelvic parameters in isthmic spondylolisthesis?微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)是否会影响峡部裂性腰椎滑脱症的功能结果和脊柱骨盆参数?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 May 15;17(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03144-y.
8
Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: 10-Year Follow-up Results.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的长期临床和影像学结果:10 年随访结果。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Apr 4;37(13):e105. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e105.
9
Development and Internal Validation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting the Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.用于预测微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后手术部位感染风险的监督式机器学习算法的开发与内部验证
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 20;8:771608. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.771608. eCollection 2021.
10
Do preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics impact patient outcomes following one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based upon presenting symptoms?基于患者的主要症状,术前的临床和影像学特征是否会影响单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术患者的预后?
Spine J. 2022 Apr;22(4):570-577. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Oct 23.