• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于患者的主要症状,术前的临床和影像学特征是否会影响单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术患者的预后?

Do preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics impact patient outcomes following one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based upon presenting symptoms?

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2022 Apr;22(4):570-577. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.013
PMID:34699995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9178522/
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) frequently present with lower extremity neurologic symptoms with or without associated lower back pain. While symptomatic improvement of leg and back pain has been reported, the resolution of back pain when it is a predominant presenting symptom remains underreported following MI-TLIF.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes at 1 year of patients undergoing MI-TLIF with lower extremity neurologic symptoms with and without a significant component of back pain.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a single surgeon surgical database from 2017 to 2019 was performed.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Fifty one patients undergoing MI-TLIF.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-reported measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual analog scale back pain (VAS-back), and VAS leg pain (VAS-leg).

METHODS

Patients were divided into two groups: Leg Pain Predominant (patients reported greater than 50% leg pain upon presentation) and Back Pain Predominant (patients reported 50% or greater back pain). Multivariate analysis was performed to determine differences between groups based upon any significantly baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Preoperative demographic and radiographic outcomes were similar between the two groups. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in ODI, VAS-Back and VAS-leg at 1-year postoperatively. On multivariate analysis, there were differences in ODI at 1-year, 1-year back pain, and 1-year leg pain between groups with those who initially presented with leg pain having a lower ODI, VAS Back, and VAS leg. Patients who presented with predominantly leg pain were more likely to meet minimal clinically important difference (MCID) criteria for ODI and VAS-back compared to those with predominantly back pain.

CONCLUSION

Following MI-TLIF, patients with lower extremity neurologic symptoms with and without a significant component of back pain have improvements in back pain, leg pain, and ODI regardless of their primary presenting pain complaint; however, patients who presented with predominantly leg pain were more likely to meet MCID criteria for improvement in their back pain and ODI score.

摘要

背景

接受微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MI-TLIF)的患者常表现出下肢神经症状,伴有或不伴有下腰痛。虽然已经报道了下肢和背部疼痛的症状改善,但在 MI-TLIF 后,当背部疼痛是主要表现症状时,其缓解情况仍报道不足。

目的

本研究旨在比较下肢神经症状伴有和不伴有显著背部疼痛成分的 MI-TLIF 患者在 1 年时的临床结果。

研究设计

对 2017 年至 2019 年期间一位外科医生的前瞻性收集数据的单一外科医生手术数据库进行回顾性研究。

患者样本

51 例接受 MI-TLIF 的患者。

结果测量

自我报告的测量包括 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)、视觉模拟量表背部疼痛(VAS-back)和视觉模拟量表腿部疼痛(VAS-leg)。

方法

患者分为两组:腿部疼痛为主(患者就诊时报告腿部疼痛大于 50%)和背部疼痛为主(患者报告 50%或更多的背部疼痛)。进行多变量分析,以根据任何显著的基线特征确定两组之间的差异。

结果

两组患者的术前人口统计学和影像学结果相似。两组患者在术后 1 年时 ODI、VAS-Back 和 VAS-leg 均有显著改善。在多变量分析中,两组在 1 年时的 ODI、1 年时的背部疼痛和 1 年时的腿部疼痛存在差异,最初表现为腿部疼痛的患者 ODI、VAS 背部和 VAS 腿部较低。与主要表现为背部疼痛的患者相比,主要表现为腿部疼痛的患者更有可能达到 ODI 和 VAS-back 的最小临床重要差异(MCID)标准。

结论

接受 MI-TLIF 治疗后,下肢神经症状伴有和不伴有显著背部疼痛成分的患者的背部疼痛、腿部疼痛和 ODI 均有改善,无论其主要表现疼痛的主诉如何;然而,主要表现为腿部疼痛的患者更有可能达到其背部疼痛和 ODI 评分改善的 MCID 标准。

相似文献

1
Do preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics impact patient outcomes following one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based upon presenting symptoms?基于患者的主要症状,术前的临床和影像学特征是否会影响单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术患者的预后?
Spine J. 2022 Apr;22(4):570-577. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
2
Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.L4/5 Ⅰ度退变性腰椎滑脱症患者斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的临床与影像学比较。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Jun;15(6):1477-1487. doi: 10.1111/os.13360. Epub 2023 May 8.
3
The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Leg Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement, and Patient Satisfaction After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.术前腿部疼痛严重程度对微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后患者报告结局、最小临床重要差异实现和患者满意度的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e1196-e1207. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
4
Does Preoperative Symptom Duration Impact Clinical Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Setting?在日间手术环境下,术前症状持续时间是否会影响微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的临床结果?
World Neurosurg. 2022 Oct;166:e599-e606. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.055. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.微创腰椎手术常见问题的实用解答。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.087. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
6
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.评估可活动扩张式椎间融合器在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症中的影像学和临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.
7
The Effect of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Postoperative Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.术前症状持续时间对微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术后疗效的影响。
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Jul;33(6):E263-E268. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000881.
8
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.经皮双侧双通道内镜技术与传统显微镜下经椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术的对比研究
Spine J. 2021 Dec;21(12):2066-2077. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
9
The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.术前残疾严重程度对微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后患者报告结局及患者满意度的影响
World Neurosurg. 2022 Mar;159:e334-e346. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.051. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
10
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.I级腰椎滑脱症的微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:来自前瞻性多中心质量结果数据库登记处的5年随访
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jan;54(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.FOCUS22602.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function With Postoperative Pain, Narcotics Consumption, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Lumbar Microdiscectomy.腰椎间盘显微切除术后患者报告结局测量信息系统身体功能与术后疼痛、麻醉药物消耗及患者报告结局指标之间的关联
Global Spine J. 2024 Jan;14(1):225-234. doi: 10.1177/21925682221103497. Epub 2022 May 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Initial Internal Validation of a Novel Classification System for Perioperative Expectations Following Minimally Invasive Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery.微创腰椎退行性疾病手术后围手术期预期的新型分类系统的制定与初步内部验证。
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Nov 1;34(9):E537-E544. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001246.
2
Charlson Comorbidity Index: An Inaccurate Predictor of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Fusion Outcomes.查尔森合并症指数:微创腰椎融合术结果的不准确预测指标
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Aug;15(4):770-779. doi: 10.14444/8099. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
3
Combining Expandable Interbody Cage Technology With a Minimally Invasive Technique to Harvest Iliac Crest Autograft Bone to Optimize Fusion Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery.将可扩张椎间融合器技术与微创技术相结合,以获取髂嵴自体骨,从而优化微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术的融合效果。
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Nov 1;34(9):E522-E530. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001228.
4
Patient-specific prediction model for clinical and quality-of-life outcomes after lumbar spine surgery.腰椎手术后临床和生活质量结局的个体化预测模型。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Jan 29;34(4):580-588. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.SPINE20577. Print 2021 Apr 1.
5
Improvements in Back and Leg Pain Following a Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后腰腿痛的改善情况
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Oct;14(5):745-755. doi: 10.14444/7107.
6
Psychometric Evaluation of Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Computer Adaptive Testing in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery: An Analysis of Responsiveness, Coverage, Discriminant Validity, and Concurrent Validity.患者报告结局测量信息系统物理功能计算机自适应测试在微创腰椎手术中的心理测量学评价:反应性、覆盖范围、判别有效性和同时效度分析。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Sep 1;28(17):717-729. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00306.
7
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Interbody Lumbar Fusion.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的比较
Global Spine J. 2020 Apr;10(2 Suppl):143S-150S. doi: 10.1177/2192568219882344. Epub 2020 May 28.
8
A Review of Techniques, Time Demand, Radiation Exposure, and Outcomes of Skin-anchored Intraoperative 3D Navigation in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Surgery.经皮微创腰椎手术中皮肤锚定术中三维导航技术、时间需求、辐射暴露和结果的综述。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Apr 15;45(8):E465-E476. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003310.
9
The Impact of Comorbidity Burden on Postoperative PROMIS Physical Function Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.合并症负担对微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后 PROMIS 躯体功能的影响。
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Jul;33(6):E294-E298. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000934.
10
Patients with predominantly back pain at the time of lumbar fusion for low-grade spondylolisthesis experience similar clinical improvement to patients with predominantly leg pain: mid-term results.对于低位型脊柱滑脱症行腰椎融合术的患者,以腰痛为主的患者与以腿痛为主的患者相比,具有相似的临床改善效果:中期结果。
Spine J. 2020 Feb;20(2):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.021. Epub 2019 Sep 26.