Clark Andrew R, Dean Jonathan LE
Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology Division, Imperial College London, 65 Aspenlea Road, Hammersmith, London W6 8LH, UK.
Open Rheumatol J. 2012;6:209-19. doi: 10.2174/1874312901206010209. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
The p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway has been strongly implicated in many of the processes that underlie the pathology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). For many years it has been considered a promising target for development of new anti-inflammatory drugs with which to treat RA and other chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. However, several recent clinical trials have concluded in a disappointing manner. Why is this so, if p38 MAPK clearly contributes to the excessive production of inflammatory mediators, the destruction of bone and cartilage? We argue that, to explain the apparent failure of p38 inhibitors in the rheumatology clinic, we need to understand better the complexities of the p38 pathway and its many levels of communication with other cellular signaling pathways. In this review we look at the p38 MAPK pathway from a slightly different perspective, emphasising its role in post-transcriptional rather than transcriptional control of gene expression, and its contribution to the off-phase rather than the on-phase of the inflammatory response.
p38丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)信号通路与类风湿关节炎(RA)病理过程中的许多机制密切相关。多年来,它一直被认为是开发治疗RA及其他慢性免疫介导炎症性疾病的新型抗炎药物的一个有前景的靶点。然而,最近的几项临床试验结果却令人失望。如果p38 MAPK显然促成了炎症介质的过度产生以及骨骼和软骨的破坏,为何会出现这种情况呢?我们认为,为了解释p38抑制剂在风湿病临床应用中明显失败的原因,我们需要更好地理解p38通路的复杂性及其与其他细胞信号通路的多层次交流。在本综述中,我们从一个略有不同的角度审视p38 MAPK通路,强调其在基因表达的转录后而非转录控制中的作用,以及其对炎症反应的消退期而非激活期的贡献。