• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

频率轨迹会影响单词识别吗?一项跨任务比较。

Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison.

作者信息

Lété Bernard, Bonin Patrick

机构信息

University of Lyon 2, Laboratoire EMC, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):973-1000. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.723725. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1080/17470218.2012.723725
PMID:23030693
Abstract

In a series of six experiments, the influence of frequency trajectory in visual word recognition was investigated. In Experiment 1, frequency trajectory was found to exert a strong and reliable influence on age of acquisition (AoA) ratings. In word reading (experiment 2), lexical decision (experiments 3 and 6), proper name decision (experiment 4), progressive demasking (experiment 5), and a multiple regression analysis of lexical decision times taken from the French Lexicon Project, the effect of frequency trajectory was not reliable. In contrast, in all the experiments and in the multiple regression analysis, cumulative frequency had a strong and reliable influence on word recognition times. The findings firmly establish that in alphabetic languages such as French, age-limited learning effects do not surface readily in word recognition. In contrast, the total exposure to words across the lifetime is a strong determinant of word recognition speed. The implications of the findings are discussed.

摘要

在一系列六项实验中,研究了频率轨迹对视觉单词识别的影响。在实验1中,发现频率轨迹对习得年龄(AoA)评分有强烈且可靠的影响。在单词阅读(实验2)、词汇判断(实验3和6)、专有名词判断(实验4)、渐进掩蔽(实验5)以及对取自法语词汇项目的词汇判断时间进行的多元回归分析中,频率轨迹的影响不可靠。相比之下,在所有实验和多元回归分析中,累积频率对单词识别时间有强烈且可靠的影响。这些发现有力地表明,在法语等字母语言中,年龄限制学习效应在单词识别中不容易显现。相反,一生中对单词的总接触量是单词识别速度的一个重要决定因素。讨论了这些发现的意义。

相似文献

1
Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison.频率轨迹会影响单词识别吗?一项跨任务比较。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):973-1000. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.723725. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
2
Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition.双音节词识别中的可意象性与习得年龄效应
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):946-72. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.722660. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
3
How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.单词阅读时间和词汇判断时间的相关性有多强?结合来自眼动语料库和大型研究的数据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(3):563-80. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.658820. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
4
Contextual diversity is a main determinant of word identification times in young readers.语境多样性是年轻读者单词识别时间的主要决定因素。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Sep;116(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.014. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
5
A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.英语词汇判断任务表现中词频和习得年龄效应的进一步考察:频率轨迹的作用
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):82-96. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000564. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
6
Frequency trajectory effects in Chinese character recognition: evidence for the arbitrary mapping hypothesis.汉字识别中的频率轨迹效应:任意映射假设的证据
Cognition. 2009 Jan;110(1):39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.004. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
7
[Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].[词汇语义变量在视觉单词识别中的作用]
Psicothema. 2006 Aug;18(3):485-91.
8
Age of acquisition persists as the main factor in picture naming when cumulative word frequency and frequency trajectory are controlled.在控制了累积词频和频率轨迹后,习得年龄仍然是图片命名中的主要因素。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Jan;60(1):32-42. doi: 10.1080/17470210600577423.
9
Age of acquisition, not word frequency affects object recognition: evidence from the effects of visual degradation.习得年龄而非词频影响物体识别:来自视觉退化效应的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Sep;129(1):130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
10
Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?发展性阅读者更倾向于使用“是/否”词汇判断任务,而不是“是/否”任务吗?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Sep;110(1):125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Word recognition during movement under simulated weather conditions.模拟天气条件下运动过程中的单词识别。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 10;20(7):e0326945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326945. eCollection 2025.
2
Corpus-based age of word acquisition: Does it support the validity of adult age-of-acquisition ratings?基于语料库的词汇习得年龄:它是否支持成人词汇习得年龄评定的有效性?
PLoS One. 2022 May 25;17(5):e0268504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268504. eCollection 2022.