Department of Parasitology, Fac, Sci, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Parasit Vectors. 2012 Oct 2;5:219. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-219.
In Central Asian foci of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniases, mixed infections of Leishmania turanica and L. major have been found in a reservoir host (the great gerbil, Rhombomys opimus) as well as in the sand fly vector Phlebotomus papatasi, but hybrids between these two Leishmania species have never been reported. In addition, the role of sand fly species other than P. papatasi in L. turanica circulation is not clear.
In this work we compared the development of L. turanica in three sand fly species belonging to different subgenera. In addition, we studied experimental co-infections of sand flies by both Leishmania species using GFP transfected L. turanica (MRHO/MN/08/BZ18(GFP+)) and RFP transfected L. major (WHOM/IR/-/173-DsRED(RFP+)). The possibility of Leishmania genetic exchange during the vectorial part of the life cycle was studied using flow cytometry combined with immunofluorescent microscopy.
Late-stage infections of L. turanica with frequent colonization of the stomodeal valve were observed in the specific vector P. (Phlebotomus) papatasi and in the permissive vector P. (Adlerius) arabicus. On the other hand, in P. sergenti (the specific vector of L. tropica), L. turanica promatigotes were present only until the defecation of bloodmeal remnants. In their natural vector P. papatasi, L. turanica and L. major developed similarly, and the spatiotemporal dynamics of localization in the sand fly gut was the same for both leishmania species. Fluorescence microscopy in combination with FACS analyses did not detect any L. major / L. turanica hybrids in the experimental co-infection of P. papatasi and P. duboscqi.
Our data provide new insight into the development of different leishmania parasite species during a mixed infection in the sand fly gut. Despite the fact that both Leishmania species developed well in P. papatasi and P. duboscqi and did not outcompete each other, no genetic exchange was found. However, the ability of L. turanica to establish late-stage infections in these specific vectors of L. major suggests that the lipophosphoglycan of this species must be identical or similar to that of L. major.
在中亚动物源性皮肤利什曼病疫区,在储存宿主(大沙鼠,Rhombomys opimus)以及在白蛉媒介中华白蛉(Phlebotomus papatasi)中发现了利什曼原虫 turanica 和 L. major 的混合感染,但这两种利什曼原虫之间的杂种从未被报道过。此外,白蛉种除 P. papatasi 以外在 L. turanica 循环中的作用尚不清楚。
在这项工作中,我们比较了属于不同亚属的三种白蛉种中 L. turanica 的发育情况。此外,我们使用 GFP 转染的 L. turanica(MRHO/MN/08/BZ18(GFP+))和 RFP 转染的 L. major(WHOM/IR/-/173-DsRED(RFP+))研究了两种利什曼原虫在白蛉中的实验性混合感染。通过流式细胞术结合免疫荧光显微镜研究了在生命周期的媒介部分期间利什曼原虫遗传交换的可能性。
在特定媒介中华白蛉(Phlebotomus)papatasi 和允许媒介 Adlerius 阿拉伯白蛉(P. arabicus)中观察到 L. turanica 的晚期感染,并且经常定植于口器瓣。另一方面,在 L. tropica 的特定媒介 P. sergenti 中,L. turanica 前体只存在于残留在血液中的粪便排出物中。在其自然媒介 P. papatasi 中,L. turanica 和 L. major 的发育相似,并且两种利什曼原虫在白蛉肠道中的定位时空动态相同。荧光显微镜结合 FACS 分析未在 P. papatasi 和 P. duboscqi 的实验性混合感染中检测到任何 L. major / L. turanica 杂种。
我们的数据提供了有关在白蛉肠道中混合感染期间不同利什曼原虫种发育的新见解。尽管两种利什曼原虫都在 P. papatasi 和 P. duboscqi 中发育良好,并且彼此之间没有竞争,但没有发现遗传交换。然而,L. turanica 在这些 L. major 的特定媒介中建立晚期感染的能力表明该物种的脂磷葡聚糖必须与其 L. major 相同或相似。