Deane G D
Department of Sociology, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27516-3997.
Demography. 1990 Feb;27(1):65-79.
In theory, residential mobility is a response to environmental stress only if households do not reduce dissatisfaction through other alternatives, such as housing improvements or repairs. Despite the attention given to stress-reducing alternatives, however, no attempt has been made to test empirically the residential satisfaction model with adjustments. Using data from the Annual Housing Survey: 1978-1981, I model three stages in the mobility process and investigate potential sources of specification error in previous tests. Blocks of family cycle, background/action state, and location/housing variables are shown to affect adjusting significantly. Residential satisfaction strongly affects mobility preferences; and all theoretically relevant blocks of explanatory variables predict mobility. Alternatives to mobility should be included in the residential satisfaction model.
从理论上讲,只有当家庭无法通过其他方式(如改善或修缮住房)来减轻不满情绪时,居住流动性才是对环境压力的一种反应。然而,尽管人们关注了减轻压力的其他方式,但尚未有人尝试对经过调整的居住满意度模型进行实证检验。利用1978 - 1981年年度住房调查的数据,我对流动过程中的三个阶段进行了建模,并调查了以往测试中可能存在的设定误差来源。家庭周期、背景/行动状态以及位置/住房变量组被证明对调整有显著影响。居住满意度强烈影响流动偏好;并且所有理论上相关的解释变量组都能预测流动性。居住满意度模型应纳入流动性的替代方式。