Bach R L, Smith J
Demography. 1977 May;14(2):147-67.
A previous residential mobility model (Speare, 1974) assumes an additive relationship between residential satisfaction, desire to move, and mobility. This paper elaborates the model and applies it to intercounty migration. An interaction between community satisfaction and expectations to migrate is hypothesized which distinguishes four groups of decision makers. A survey in Durham, North Carolina and a unique mobility follow-up over eight years provide the data to test the model and the interaction. Furthermore, using various time periods for identifying migrants offers some methodological insights. Results support Speare's general formulation but only after the interaction is taken into account. A three-year migration interval is found to be appropriate.
之前的居住流动性模型(斯皮尔,1974年)假定居住满意度、迁移意愿和流动性之间存在一种累加关系。本文对该模型进行了详细阐述,并将其应用于县际迁移。研究假设社区满意度和迁移期望之间存在一种相互作用关系,据此区分出四类决策者。在北卡罗来纳州达勒姆市进行的一项调查以及长达八年的独特流动性跟踪调查为检验该模型及相互作用关系提供了数据。此外,使用不同时间段来确定移民提供了一些方法论上的见解。结果支持斯皮尔的总体公式,但前提是要考虑到相互作用关系。研究发现三年的迁移间隔是合适的。