TagesTherapieZentrum (TTZ), Interdisciplinary Tumour Centre, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Haus 9, Mannheim 68167, Germany.
Br J Cancer. 2012 Nov 6;107(10):1678-83. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.434. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
Hand-foot-skin reaction (HFSR) is an adverse event frequently observed during treatment with capecitabine (cape). In the present analysis, we sought to evaluate the potential association of HFSR and survival in German patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and locally advanced rectal cancer treated with cape in clinical trials.
Patients of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Internistische Onkologie (AIO) KRK-0104 and the Mannheim rectal cancer trial were evaluated. HFSR was graded according to NCI-CTC criteria in both trials. Time to first occurrence of HFSR was described per cycle and HFSR developing during cycles 1 and 2 was defined as 'early HFSR'. Baseline characteristics between the patient groups with or without HFSR were compared using Mann-Whitney-U, Fisher's exact or χ(2)-test, as appropriate. Haematological and non-haematological toxicities observed in both groups were compared using Fisher's exact test. Progression-free (PFS) or disease-free (DFS) as well as overall survival (OS) data from both trials were pooled and the HFSR group was compared with the non-HFSR using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
A total of 374 patients were included, of whom 29.3% developed any HFSR. Of these, 51% had early HFSR. Baseline characteristics were comparable between both HFSR groups concerning age, gender, ECOG performance status and UICC stage. On multivariate analysis none of these factors had influence on the occurrence of HFSR. The percentage of all-grade (and grade 3-4) haematological toxicities did not differ between both the groups. By contrast, patients exhibiting HFSR had a significantly higher rate of all-grade (but not grade 3-4) diarrhoea, stomatitis/mucositis and fatigue (P<0.01, respectively). Patients with HFSR had improved PFS/DFS (29.0 vs 11.4 months; P=0.015, HR 0.69) and OS (75.8 vs 41.0 months; P=0.001, HR=0.56). Within the HFSR group, PFS/DFS and OS were comparable between patients with early vs late HFSR.
The present analysis provides evidence for the association of HFSR and survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Baseline characteristics, with the exception of UICC stage, older age and ECOG performance status, and the time of occurrence of HFSR had no impact on survival. Patients with HFSR had a higher probability of developing any-grade gastrointestinal toxicity and fatigue while no correlation with haematological toxicity was found.
手足皮肤反应(HFSR)是卡培他滨(cape)治疗期间经常观察到的一种不良反应。在本分析中,我们旨在评估 HFSR 与德国转移性结直肠癌和局部晚期直肠癌患者生存的潜在关联,这些患者在临床试验中接受 cape 治疗。
评估了 Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Internistische Onkologie(AIO)KRK-0104 和曼海姆直肠癌试验的患者。在这两项试验中,根据 NCI-CTC 标准对 HFSR 进行分级。按周期描述首次发生 HFSR 的时间,将第 1 和第 2 周期发生的 HFSR 定义为“早期 HFSR”。使用 Mann-Whitney-U、Fisher 确切检验或 χ(2)检验比较有或无 HFSR 患者组之间的基线特征,具体取决于情况。使用 Fisher 确切检验比较两组之间观察到的血液学和非血液学毒性。汇总两项试验的无进展生存期(PFS)或无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)数据,并使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析比较 HFSR 组与非 HFSR 组。
共纳入 374 例患者,其中 29.3%发生任何 HFSR。其中,51%发生早期 HFSR。在年龄、性别、ECOG 表现状态和 UICC 分期方面,两组 HFSR 患者的基线特征相当。多变量分析显示,这些因素均未影响 HFSR 的发生。两组的所有级别(和 3-4 级)血液学毒性的百分比无差异。相比之下,发生 HFSR 的患者腹泻、口腔炎/黏膜炎和疲劳的所有级别(但非 3-4 级)发生率明显更高(分别为 P<0.01)。发生 HFSR 的患者 PFS/DFS(29.0 与 11.4 个月;P=0.015,HR 0.69)和 OS(75.8 与 41.0 个月;P=0.001,HR=0.56)得到改善。在 HFSR 组中,早期与晚期 HFSR 患者的 PFS/DFS 和 OS 相当。
本分析提供了 HFSR 与结直肠癌患者生存相关的证据。除 UICC 分期、年龄较大和 ECOG 表现状态外,基线特征以及 HFSR 的发生时间对生存没有影响。发生 HFSR 的患者发生任何级别胃肠道毒性和疲劳的可能性更高,但与血液学毒性无关。