Department of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Nov;87(5):927-32. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0136. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
We retrospectively reviewed a 10-year experience of administration of cotrimoxazole alone in 31 patients compared with 109 patients who received conventional eradication therapy (cotrimoxazole plus doxycycline). The baseline characteristics, the clinical manifestations, the initial intravenous antibiotic treatments, and the mean duration of eradication therapy between the two groups were similar. The culture-confirmed recurrences among the patients who received cotrimoxazole alone and those who received the conventional regimen were not significantly different (1/31 [3.2%] versus 5/109 [4.5% odds ratio = 0.69 [95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08-6.17]). Gastrointestinal side effects were more common among the conventional regimen group (28/109 [25.7%] versus 2/31 [6.5%], P = 0.02) and the proportion of patients who could complete at least 20 weeks of therapy without having switched to the other regimen was significantly lower (91/109 [83.5%] versus 31/31 [100.0%] P = 0.01). Cotrimoxazole alone is as effective as and better tolerated than cotrimoxazole plus doxycycline for the eradication treatment of melioidosis.
我们回顾性分析了单独使用复方新诺明治疗的 31 例患者和接受常规清除治疗(复方新诺明加强力霉素)的 109 例患者的 10 年经验。两组患者的基线特征、临床表现、初始静脉抗生素治疗和清除治疗的平均持续时间相似。单独使用复方新诺明和常规方案治疗的患者中,经培养证实的复发率无显著差异(31 例中有 1 例[3.2%],109 例中有 5 例[4.5%],比值比=0.69[95%置信区间:0.08-6.17])。常规方案组胃肠道副作用更为常见(109 例中有 28 例[25.7%],31 例中有 2 例[6.5%],P=0.02),且能够至少完成 20 周治疗而无需转换为另一种方案的患者比例明显更低(109 例中有 91 例[83.5%],31 例中有 31 例[100.0%],P=0.01)。单独使用复方新诺明治疗与复方新诺明加强力霉素治疗一样有效,且耐受性更好,可用于清除治疗类鼻疽。