Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China.
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec;81(12):3905-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.06.022. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
To assess the image quality (IQ) of an iterative reconstruction (IR) technique (iDose(4)) from prospective electrocardiography (ECG)-triggered coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA) on a 256-slice multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanner and determine the optimal dose reduction using IR that can provide IQ comparable to filtered back projection (FBP).
110 consecutive patients (69 men, 41 women; age: 54 ± 10 years) underwent coronary CTA on a 256-slice MDCT (Brilliance iCT, Philips Healthcare). The control group (Group A, n=21) were scanned using the conventional tube output (120 kVp, 210 mAs) and reconstructed using FBP. The other 4 groups were scanned with the same kVp but successively reduced tube output as follows: B[n=15]: 125 mAs; C[n=22]: 105 mAs; D[n=36]: 84 mAs: E[n=16]: 65 mAs) and reconstructed using IR levels of L3 (Group B), L4 (Group C) and L5 (Groups D and E), to compensate for the noise increase. All images were reconstructed using the same kernel (XCB). Two radiologists graded IQ in a blinded fashion on a 4-point scale (4 - excellent, 3 - good, 2 - fair and 1 - poor). Quantitative measurements of CT values, image noise and contrast-to-noise (CNR) were measured in each group. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine a radiation reduction threshold up to which excellent IQ was maintained.
There were no significant differences in objective noise, SNR and CNR values among Groups A, B, C, D, and E (P=0.14, 0.09, 0.17, respectively). There were no significant differences in the scores of the subjective IQ between Group A, and Groups B, C, D, E (P=0.23-0.97). Significant differences in image sharpness and study acceptability were observed between groups A and E (P<0.05). Using the criterion of excellent IQ (score 4), the ROC curve of dose levels and IQ acceptability established a reduction of 60% of tube output (Group D) as optimum cutoff point (AUC: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59-0.86). Group D (84 mAs with L5) provided equivalent subjective image ranking (with lumen sharpness taken into account) and objective IQ measurements (noise: 36.5 ± 10.7; SNR: 13.6 ± 4.9; CNR: 16.28 ± 5.4) compared with FBP images in Group A (noise: 35.5 ± 9.4; SNR: 12.4 ± 2.5; CNR: 15.4 ± 3.2) (P=0.14, 0.09, 0.17, respectively). The effective dose (ED) of Group D was 63% lower than that of Group A (1.2 ± 0.1 mSv versus 3.2 ± 0.6 mSv).
Iterative reconstruction techniques can provide 63% ED reduction in prospectively-triggered coronary CTA using 256-slice MDCT while maintaining excellent image quality.
评估前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术(coronary CTA)中迭代重建(IR)技术(iDose(4))的图像质量(IQ),并确定最佳剂量降低,以便使用 IR 提供与滤波反投影(FBP)相当的 IQ。
110 名连续患者(69 名男性,41 名女性;年龄:54±10 岁)在 256 层多探测器 CT(Brilliance iCT,飞利浦医疗保健)上进行冠状动脉 CTA。对照组(A 组,n=21)采用常规管输出(120 kVp,210 mAs)扫描,使用 FBP 重建。另外 4 组以相同的管电压但依次降低管输出进行扫描:B[n=15]:125 mAs;C[n=22]:105 mAs;D[n=36]:84 mAs:E[n=16]:65 mAs),并用 IR 级别 L3(B 组)、L4(C 组)和 L5(D 组和 E 组)进行重建,以补偿噪声增加。所有图像均使用相同的内核(XCB)重建。两名放射科医生对 IQ 进行盲法评分,分为 4 分制(4-优秀,3-良好,2-中等,1-差)。在每组中测量 CT 值、图像噪声和对比噪声比(CNR)的定量测量值。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)分析,以确定维持优秀 IQ 的辐射降低阈值。
A、B、C、D 和 E 组之间的客观噪声、SNR 和 CNR 值没有显著差异(P=0.14、0.09、0.17)。A 组与 B、C、D、E 组之间的主观 IQ 评分无显著差异(P=0.23-0.97)。A 组与 E 组之间观察到图像清晰度和研究可接受性的显著差异(P<0.05)。使用优秀 IQ(评分 4)的标准,剂量水平和 IQ 可接受性的 ROC 曲线确定管输出降低 60%(组 D)为最佳截止点(AUC:0.72,95%CI:0.59-0.86)。组 D(84 mAs 与 L5)提供了与 FBP 图像相同的主观图像排名(考虑到管腔清晰度)和客观 IQ 测量值(噪声:36.5±10.7;SNR:13.6±4.9;CNR:16.28±5.4)与 A 组(噪声:35.5±9.4;SNR:12.4±2.5;CNR:15.4±3.2)(P=0.14、0.09、0.17)。组 D 的有效剂量(ED)比组 A 低 63%(1.2±0.1 mSv 与 3.2±0.6 mSv)。
使用 256 层 MDCT 进行前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉 CTA 时,迭代重建技术可降低 63%的 ED,同时保持优秀的图像质量。