Department of Neuroendovascular Therapy, Kohnan Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
J Neurosurg. 2013 Jan;118(1):131-9. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.JNS12566. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
Internal coil trapping is a treatment method used to prevent rebleeding from a ruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissection (VAD). Postoperative medullary infarctions have been reported as a complication of this treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between a postoperative medullary infarction and the clinical outcomes for patients with ruptured VADs treated with internal coil trapping during the acute stage of a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).
A retrospective study identified 38 patients who presented between 2006 and 2011 with ruptured VADs and underwent internal coil trapping during the acute stage of SAH. The SAH was identified on CT scanning, and the diagnosis for VAD was rendered by cerebral angiography. Under general anesthesia, the dissection was packed with coils, beginning at the distal end and proceeding proximally. When VAD involved the origin of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) with a large cerebellar territory, an occipital artery (OA)-PICA anastomosis was created prior to internal coil trapping. The pre- and postoperative radiological findings, clinical course, and outcomes were analyzed.
The internal coil trapping was completed within 24 hours after admission. An OA-PICA anastomosis followed by internal coil trapping was performed in 5 patients. Postoperative rebleeding did not occur in any patient during a mean follow-up period of 16 months. The postoperative MRI studies showed medullary infarctions in 18 patients (47%). The mean length of the trapped VAD for the infarction group (15.7 ± 6.0 mm) was significantly longer than that of the noninfarction group (11.5 ± 4.3 mm) (p = 0.019). Three of the 5 patients treated with OA-PICA anastomosis had postoperative medullary infarction. The clinical outcomes at 6 months were favorable (modified Rankin Scale Scores 0-2) for 23 patients (60.5%) and unfavorable (modified Rankin Scale Scores 3-6) for 15 patients (39.5%). Of the 18 patients with postoperative medullary infarctions, the outcomes were favorable for 6 patients (33.3%) and unfavorable for 12 patients (66.7%). A logistic regression analysis predicted the following independent risk factors for unfavorable outcomes: postoperative medullary infarctions (OR 21.287 [95% CI 2.622-498.242], p = 0.003); preoperative rebleeding episodes (OR 7.450 [95% CI 1.140-71.138], p = 0.036); and a history of diabetes mellitus (OR 45.456 [95% CI 1.993-5287.595], p = 0.013).
A postoperative medullary infarction was associated with unfavorable outcomes after internal coil trapping for ruptured VADs. Coil occlusion of the long segment of the VA led to medullary infarction, and an OA-PICA bypass did not prevent medullary infarction. A VA-sparing procedure, such as flow diversion by stenting, is an alternative treatment in the future, if this approach is demonstrated to effectively prevent rebleeding.
血管内线圈夹闭术是一种用于防止破裂颅内椎动脉夹层(VAD)再出血的治疗方法。术后延髓梗死已被报道为该治疗策略的并发症。本研究旨在确定急性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)期间接受 VAD 破裂患者血管内线圈夹闭术后延髓梗死与临床结果之间的关系。
回顾性研究确定了 2006 年至 2011 年间 38 例 VAD 破裂并在急性 SAH 期间接受血管内线圈夹闭术的患者。CT 扫描发现 SAH,脑血管造影诊断 VAD。在全身麻醉下,从远端开始向近端包裹血管内线圈。当 VAD 累及小脑后下动脉(PICA)起源并伴有较大的小脑区域时,在血管内线圈夹闭术之前进行枕动脉(OA)-PICA 吻合术。分析术前和术后的影像学表现、临床过程和结果。
血管内线圈夹闭术在入院后 24 小时内完成。5 例患者进行了 OA-PICA 吻合术和血管内线圈夹闭术。在平均 16 个月的随访期间,没有患者在术后再出血。术后 MRI 研究显示 18 例患者(47%)存在延髓梗死。梗死组(15.7 ± 6.0mm)的夹闭 VAD 平均长度明显长于非梗死组(11.5 ± 4.3mm)(p = 0.019)。接受 OA-PICA 吻合术治疗的 5 例患者中有 3 例发生术后延髓梗死。6 个月时临床预后良好(改良 Rankin 量表评分 0-2)的患者有 23 例(60.5%),预后不良(改良 Rankin 量表评分 3-6)的患者有 15 例(39.5%)。18 例术后发生延髓梗死的患者中,预后良好的患者有 6 例(33.3%),预后不良的患者有 12 例(66.7%)。Logistic 回归分析预测以下独立的预后不良因素:术后延髓梗死(OR 21.287[95%CI 2.622-498.242],p = 0.003);术前再出血发作(OR 7.450[95%CI 1.140-71.138],p = 0.036);糖尿病史(OR 45.456[95%CI 1.993-5287.595],p = 0.013)。
血管内线圈夹闭治疗 VAD 破裂后,术后延髓梗死与不良预后相关。VA 的长节段闭塞导致延髓梗死,而 OA-PICA 旁路并不能预防延髓梗死。如果血管内支架血流分流术等血管保留术式被证明能有效预防再出血,那么该术式将成为未来的替代治疗方法。