Shindo Koichiro, Ogino Tatsuya, Endo Hideki, Fukuda Mamoru, Matsuda Megumi, Yamashita Daisuke, Yamaguchi Daishi, Yoshihara Ryunosuke, Morishita Masahiro, Tatsuta Yasuyuki, Sakurai Suguru, Kyono Masanori, Goto Daigo, Asanome Taku, Osato Toshiaki, Nakamura Hirohiko
Department of Neurosurgery, Nakamura Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Center for Endovascular Neurosurgery, Nakamura Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2021;15(9):565-573. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0157. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
In parent artery occlusion (PAO) for ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (RVADA), target embolization using coils in a short segment to occlude only the vasodilated area containing the rupture point is selected as a first-choice procedure at our institute. We focused on RVADA involving the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) and evaluated the treatment results.
This study consisted of eight cases with RVADA involving the PICA which were treated between October 2007 and January 2020. Based on radiological findings such as the bleb, the rupture points were located at the affected vertebral artery (VA) distal to PICA in all cases. Target embolization, by which only coiling at the dilated segment distal to the VA was performed. We aimed to preserve blood flow to the PICA. The incidence and extent of medullary infarctions, and neurological outcome were retrospectively assessed.
Regarding the diameter of bilateral VA, there were no differences in six cases while the affected VA with RVADA were larger in the remaining two cases. PICA was preserved in all cases but one in which occlusion of complementary PICA was observed. Postoperative medullary infarction was not noted. There was no rebleeding during the follow-up period. However, recanalization of the VA was observed in four cases and additional coil embolization was performed. All patients were discharged with a good outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0; seven patients, mRS 2; one patient).
Target embolization preserving the PICA in PICA-involved type RVADA was considered to be an effective treatment method for cases whose rupture point was located in the VA distal to PICA orifice.
在治疗破裂性椎动脉夹层动脉瘤(RVADA)的 parent 动脉闭塞(PAO)中,我院首选的方法是使用线圈在短节段进行靶向栓塞,仅闭塞包含破裂点的血管扩张区域。我们重点关注累及小脑后下动脉(PICA)的 RVADA,并评估了治疗结果。
本研究纳入了 2007 年 10 月至 2020 年 1 月期间治疗的 8 例累及 PICA 的 RVADA 患者。根据诸如小泡等影像学表现,所有病例的破裂点均位于 PICA 远端的患侧椎动脉(VA)。进行靶向栓塞,即仅在 VA 远端的扩张节段进行线圈栓塞。我们旨在保留 PICA 的血流。回顾性评估延髓梗死的发生率和范围以及神经功能结局。
关于双侧 VA 的直径,6 例无差异,其余 2 例中患侧 RVADA 的 VA 较大。除 1 例观察到互补性 PICA 闭塞外,所有病例的 PICA 均得以保留。术后未发现延髓梗死。随访期间无再出血情况。然而,4 例观察到 VA 再通,并进行了额外的线圈栓塞。所有患者出院时预后良好(改良 Rankin 量表[mRS]0 分;7 例患者,mRS 2 分;1 例患者)。
对于破裂点位于 PICA 开口远端 VA 的 PICA 累及型 RVADA 病例,保留 PICA 的靶向栓塞被认为是一种有效的治疗方法。