• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

埃克塞特短柄与标准长度埃克塞特柄的比较:来自澳大利亚矫形协会国家关节置换登记处的经验。

Exeter short stems compared with standard length Exeter stems: experience from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

机构信息

Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2013 Jan;28(1):103-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2012.06.016
PMID:23040643
Abstract

The standard Exeter stem has a length of 150 mm with offsets 37.5 to 56 mm. Shorter stems of lengths 95, 115 and 125 mm with offsets 35.5 mm or less are available for patients with smaller femurs. Concern has been raised regarding the behavior of the smaller implants. This paper analyzed data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry comparing survivorship of stems of offset 35.5 mm or less with the standard stems of 37.5 mm offset or greater. At 7 years, there was no significant difference in the cumulative percent revision rate in the short stems (3.4%, 95% CI 2.4-4.8%) compared with the standard length stems (3.5%, 95% CI 3.3-3.8%) despite its use in a greater proportion of potentially more difficult developmental dysplasia of the hip cases.

摘要

Exeter 标准柄的长度为 150mm,偏距为 37.5 至 56mm。对于股骨较小的患者,还有长度为 95、115 和 125mm 且偏距小于 35.5mm 的短柄可供选择。人们对较小植入物的行为表示担忧。本文分析了来自澳大利亚矫形协会国家关节置换登记处的数据,比较了偏距为 35.5mm 或更小的柄与偏距为 37.5mm 或更大的标准柄的存活率。7 年时,短柄(3.4%,95%CI2.4-4.8%)的累计翻修率与标准长度柄(3.5%,95%CI3.3-3.8%)相比无显著差异,尽管其在更多可能更具挑战性的发育性髋关节发育不良病例中使用。

相似文献

1
Exeter short stems compared with standard length Exeter stems: experience from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.埃克塞特短柄与标准长度埃克塞特柄的比较:来自澳大利亚矫形协会国家关节置换登记处的经验。
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Jan;28(1):103-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
2
The use of femoral stems with exchangeable necks in primary total hip arthroplasty increases the rate of revision.在初次全髋关节置换术中使用带可更换颈的股骨柄会增加翻修率。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jun;99-B(6):766-773. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.38020.
3
How do cemented short Exeter stems perform compared with standard-length Exeter stems? The experience of the New Zealand National Joint Registry.与标准长度的埃克塞特柄相比,骨水泥型短埃克塞特柄的表现如何?新西兰国家关节注册中心的经验。
Arthroplast Today. 2020 Mar 3;6(1):104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.01.003. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry.在34721例单品牌骨水泥型髋关节置换术中,髋臼假体的设计和股骨头大小对翻修风险有影响:一项基于国家关节注册中心中期数据的回顾性队列研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Dec;94(12):1611-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B12.30040.
5
Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.年轻患者原发性骨关节炎的非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术:来自芬兰关节置换登记处的中长期随访研究
Acta Orthop. 2006 Feb;77(1):57-70. doi: 10.1080/17453670610045704.
6
Femoral impaction bone grafting with the Exeter stem - the Swedish experience: survivorship analysis of 1305 revisions performed between 1989 and 2002.使用埃克塞特柄进行股骨嵌压植骨术——瑞典的经验:对1989年至2002年间进行的1305例翻修手术的生存率分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Apr;91(4):441-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B4.21319.
7
Periprosthetic fracture torque for short versus standard cemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.短柄与标准骨水泥型髋关节柄假体周围骨折扭矩:一项体外实验研究
J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):1067-71. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.10.016. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
8
Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surface and risk of revision due to dislocation after primary total hip replacement.初次全髋关节置换术后陶瓷对陶瓷关节面与因脱位导致翻修的风险
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Nov;91(11):1448-53. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B11.22100.
9
Survival of the Exeter V40 short revision (44/00/125) stem when used in primary total hip arthroplasty.在初次全髋关节置换术中使用 Exeter V40 短翻修(44/00/125)柄的存活率。
Bone Joint J. 2023 May 1;105-B(5):504-510. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B5.BJJ-2022-1124.R1.
10
The utility of cemented femoral stems in modern THA: a 10-year comparative analysis of the Charnley and Exeter stems.骨水泥型股骨柄在现代全髋关节置换术中的应用:Charnley 和 Exeter 柄的 10 年对比分析。
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Feb;193(1):251-255. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03381-y. Epub 2023 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Can artificial intelligence generate scientific discussion that passes peer review for publication in a high-impact orthopaedic journal?人工智能能否生成能通过同行评审并在高影响力的骨科期刊上发表的科学讨论?
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-03971-y.
2
Equivalent revision rates and patient reported outcomes with routine use of a short (125mm) cemented stem for total hip arthroplasty compared to a standard length (150mm) cemented stem. A two surgeon series of 1335 patients.与使用标准长度(150mm)骨水泥固定柄相比,在全髋关节置换术中常规使用短柄(125mm)骨水泥固定柄的等效修正率和患者报告的结果。两位外科医生系列的 1335 名患者。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 May;144(5):2019-2026. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05235-3. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
3
Is it reasonable to shorten the length of cemented stems? A finite element analysis and biomechanical experiment.缩短骨水泥柄的长度是否合理?一项有限元分析和生物力学实验。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Nov 17;11:1289985. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1289985. eCollection 2023.
4
5 year follow up of a hydroxyapatite coated short stem femoral component for hip arthroplasty: a prospective multicentre study.髋关节置换术后羟基磷灰石涂层短柄股骨假体 5 年随访:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 11;13(1):17166. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44191-7.
5
Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs.在多氏A型股骨中,与骨水泥型埃克塞特标准柄相比,骨水泥型埃克塞特短柄早期下沉较少。
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Jul 6;4(7):507-515. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.47.BJO-2023-0008.R1.
6
Clinical and Functional Outcomes of the Exeter V40 Short Stem in Primary and Revision Arthroplasty: Does the Indication Affect Outcomes in the Short Term?Exeter V40短柄假体在初次和翻修关节置换术中的临床及功能结果:适应证在短期内是否会影响结果?
Hip Pelvis. 2023 Mar;35(1):40-46. doi: 10.5371/hp.2023.35.1.40. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
7
Clinical evaluation of the cemented Exeter Short 125 mm stem at a minimum of 3 years: A prospective cohort study.骨水泥型Exeter短柄125毫米股骨柄假体至少3年的临床评估:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Orthop. 2022 Feb 7;30:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.02.005. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
8
Analysis of the Exeter V40 femoral stem prosthesis fracture : systematic review and single centre case series.埃克塞特V40股骨柄假体骨折分析:系统评价与单中心病例系列
Bone Jt Open. 2021 Jun;2(6):443-456. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.26.BJO-2021-0025.R1.
9
Biomechanics of a cemented short stem: a comparative in vitro study regarding primary stability and maximum fracture load.骨水泥型短柄的生物力学:一项关于初始稳定性和最大骨折负荷的体外对比研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Oct;141(10):1797-1806. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03843-x. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
10
A comparison of short-stem prostheses and conventional stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.初次全髋关节置换术中短柄假体与传统柄假体的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Feb;9(3):231. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4043.