• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Guarding the guardians: research on editorial peer review. Selected proceedings from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. May 10-12, 1989, Chicago, Ill.

出版信息

JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1317-1441.

PMID:2304208
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Guarding the guardians: research on editorial peer review. Selected proceedings from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. May 10-12, 1989, Chicago, Ill.守护把关人：编辑同行评审研究。首届生物医学出版同行评审国际大会会议论文选集。1989年5月10 - 12日，伊利诺伊州芝加哥
JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1317-1441.
2
The international congress on peer review in biomedical publication.
JAMA. 1989 Feb 3;261(5):749.
3
Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. Prague, Czech Republic, September 1997.
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):213-302.
4
Guarding the guardians: a conference on editorial peer review.守护把关人：一场关于编辑同行评审的会议
JAMA. 1986 Nov 7;256(17):2391-2.
5
Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.保留电子稿件文件的盲审制度。
Nurse Author Ed. 2005 Winter;15(1):1-4, 7.
6
[On publication language and international publishing, success of Professor Özaydın and Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, peer-review and academic depression].[关于出版语言与国际出版、厄扎伊丁教授与《安纳托利亚心脏病学杂志》的成功、同行评审与学术抑郁]
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2013 May;13(3):202-3. doi: 10.5152/akd.2013.135.
7
After all, that is "science"--the Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, Chicago 2005.
Croat Med J. 2005 Dec;46(6):1003-4.
8
Peer review: purpose, process and publication.同行评审：目的、流程与发表
Clin Teach. 2012 Aug;9(4):201-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00612.x.
9
Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.履行医学出版中的道德义务：同行评审期刊编辑、作者及读者的责任
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 May;123(5):684-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.5.684.
10
Ninth international congress on peer review and scientific publication: call for research.第九届同行评审与科学出版国际大会：研究征集
BMJ. 2019 Sep 16;366:l5475. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5475.

引用本文的文献

1
The missing hydrogen ion, Part-3: Science and the human flaws that compromise it.缺失的氢离子，第三部分：科学与危及科学的人性弱点
Sports Med Health Sci. 2024 Mar 24;6(2):193-199. doi: 10.1016/j.smhs.2024.03.008. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
How to be a better scientist: Lessons from scientific philosophy, the historical development of science, and past errors within exercise physiology.如何成为一名更优秀的科学家：来自科学哲学、科学历史发展以及运动生理学既往错误的经验教训。
Sports Med Health Sci. 2022 Apr 14;4(2):140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.smhs.2022.04.001. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Development of a checklist to detect errors in meta-analyses in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocol.
制定清单以检测系统评价中干预措施的荟萃分析中的错误：研究方案。
F1000Res. 2021 Jun 8;10:455. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.53034.1. eCollection 2021.
4
Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study.使用基于 CONSORT 的在线同行评审工具 (COBPeer) 与常规同行评审流程相比，早期职业同行评审员在检测研究报告不充分方面的准确性：一项横断面诊断研究。
BMC Med. 2019 Nov 19;17(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1436-0.
5
Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives.生物医学科学资助评审现状调查：资助机构和评审人的观点。
BMC Med. 2010 Oct 20;8:62. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-62.
6
Roles for scientific societies in promoting integrity in publication ethics.科学协会在促进出版伦理诚信方面的作用。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Apr;9(2):221-41. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0010-4.
7
Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: what has and has not been accomplished?20世纪80年代和90年代应对科学领域的不当行为：已取得和未取得哪些成果？
Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Apr;5(2):161-76. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0005-x.
8
Medical editors, journal owners, and the sacking of George Lundberg.医学编辑、期刊所有者与乔治·伦德伯格被解雇事件
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Mar;14(3):200-2. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00347.x.
9
Evidence on peer review-scientific quality control or smokescreen?同行评审——科学质量控制还是障眼法？相关证据
BMJ. 1999 Jan 2;318(7175):44-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.44.
10
Opening up BMJ peer review.开放《英国医学杂志》的同行评审。
BMJ. 1999 Jan 2;318(7175):4-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.4.