Opening up BMJ peer review.
作者信息
Smith R
出版信息
BMJ. 1999 Jan 2;318(7175):4-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.4.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Opening up BMJ peer review.开放《英国医学杂志》的同行评审。
BMJ. 1999 Jan 2;318(7175):4-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.4.
2
3
Disparities in the geographical distribution of authorship between invited and peer reviewed papers.受邀论文与同行评审论文在作者地理分布上的差异。
Scott Med J. 1999 Oct;44(5):149-51. doi: 10.1177/003693309904400508.
4
Peer review: the unsung heroes.同行评审：无名英雄。
Bone Joint J. 2014 Apr;96-B(4):433-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.33703.
5
Major publisher retracts 43 papers, alleging fake peer review.主要出版商撤回43篇论文，称存在虚假同行评审。
BMJ. 2015 Apr 1;350:h1783. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1783.
6
Importance of peer review for CDPH.同行评审对加州公共卫生部的重要性。
Commun Dis Public Health. 2003 Dec;6(4):277-8.
7
Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party.《英国医学杂志》经济学投稿的作者及同行评审指南。《英国医学杂志》经济评估工作小组。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 3;313(7052):275-83. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275.
8
From submission to publication: a retrospective review of the tables and figures in a cohort of randomized controlled trials submitted to the British Medical Journal.从投稿到发表：对提交给《英国医学杂志》的一组随机对照试验中的表格和图表进行回顾性分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;48(6):750-6, 756.e1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.017. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
9
Defamation bill gives defence of qualified privilege to peer reviewed journal articles.诽谤法案赋予同行评审期刊文章享有有限特权抗辩权。
BMJ. 2013 Apr 25;346:f2691. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2691.
10
Please publish me.请发表我。
Postgrad Med J. 2003 Aug;79(934):427. doi: 10.1136/pmj.79.934.427.
引用本文的文献
1
How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought.如何改进科学同行评审：四种思想流派。
Learn Publ. 2023 Jul;36(3):334-347. doi: 10.1002/leap.1544. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
2
Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values.扰乱默顿：开放科学实践与默顿价值观的交叉点。
Account Res. 2024 Jul;31(5):428-455. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2141625. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
3
Peer review: concepts, variants and controversies.同行评审：概念、变体与争议
Singapore Med J. 2022 Feb;63(2):55-60. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2021139. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
4
Editorial Peer Reviewers as Shepherds, Rather Than Gatekeepers.编辑同行评审员：当如牧羊人，而非守门员
J Bone Miner Res. 2021 Jul;36(7):1220-1224. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4319. Epub 2021 May 6.
5
Prestige bias--an old, untreated enemy of the peer-review process.声望偏见——同行评审过程中一个古老且未得到解决的问题。
Hippokratia. 2020 Apr-Jun;24(2):94.
6
What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis.审稿人在评审定性手稿时会给出什么反馈？一项聚焦的映射式综述与综合。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 18;20(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01005-y.
7
Visual abstracts: an innovative way to disseminate scientific Information.可视化摘要：一种传播科学信息的创新方式。
J Bras Nefrol. 2020 Feb 21;42(3):357-360. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2019-0213.
8
The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications.不同同行评审程序标记有问题出版物的能力。
Scientometrics. 2019;118(1):339-373. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2969-2. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
9
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals.发表同行评议报告对五个学术期刊审稿人行为的影响。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 18;10(1):322. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08250-2.
10
The changing forms and expectations of peer review.同行评审不断变化的形式与期望。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Sep 20;3:8. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0051-5. eCollection 2018.
本文引用的文献
1
Evidence on peer review-scientific quality control or smokescreen?同行评审——科学质量控制还是障眼法？相关证据
BMJ. 1999 Jan 2;318(7175):44-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.44.
2
Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial.公开同行评审对评审质量及评审者建议的影响：一项随机试验
BMJ. 1999 Jan 2;318(7175):23-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.23.
3
Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.屏蔽作者身份能否提高同行评审质量？一项随机对照试验。同行评审研究调查员。
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):240-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.240.
4
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial.盲法与揭盲对同行评审质量的影响：一项随机试验
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):234-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.234.
5
What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts?怎样才能成为一名优秀的稿件评审人？
BMJ. 1998 Jan 10;316(7125):86. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7125.86.
6
Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde.读者对同行评审和编辑对《荷兰医学杂志》文章质量影响的评价。
Lancet. 1996 Nov 30;348(9040):1480-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05016-7.
7
The Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication.第二届生物医学出版同行评审国际大会。
JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):91. doi: 10.1001/jama.1994.03520020017003.
8
Anonymity of reviewers.审稿人的匿名性。
Cardiovasc Res. 1994 Aug;28(8):1134-9; discussion 1140-5. doi: 10.1093/cvr/28.8.1134.
9
The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial.盲法对同行评审质量的影响。一项随机试验。
JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1371-6.
Zotero 插件