Naughton M J, Luepker R V, Strickland D
Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.
JAMA. 1990 Mar 2;263(9):1213-7.
To determine the accuracy of portable cholesterol analyzers in public settings, four screening organizations were accompanied to cholesterol screenings where consenting participants completed the finger-stick procedure and provided a blood sample by venipuncture. The finger-stick values were compared later with the participants' blood cholesterol values obtained in a reference laboratory. The results indicated that only one of the organizations produced cholesterol measurements entirely within the acceptable range (+/- 14.2%), while the accuracy of the other three organizations ranged from 76.5% to 96.4%. Those finger-stick values that did not fall within the acceptable range tended to underestimate the laboratory cholesterol values. Additionally, classification of the persons screened based on the National Cholesterol Education Program risk categories indicated that the finger-stick values primarily tended to produce false-negative results. The variability of the results across organizations was caused partially by insufficient operator training. However, inadequate quality-control procedures for field settings and dilution of capillary blood by tissue fluid also may have contributed to the inaccurate finger-stick results.
为确定公共场所便携式胆固醇分析仪的准确性,研究人员跟随四个筛查机构进行胆固醇筛查,同意参与的受试者完成手指采血程序并通过静脉穿刺提供血样。随后将手指采血值与在参考实验室获得的受试者血液胆固醇值进行比较。结果表明,只有一个机构的胆固醇测量结果完全在可接受范围内(±14.2%),而其他三个机构的准确率在76.5%至96.4%之间。那些不在可接受范围内的手指采血值往往低估了实验室胆固醇值。此外,根据国家胆固醇教育计划风险类别对筛查对象进行分类表明,手指采血值主要倾向于产生假阴性结果。各机构结果的差异部分是由于操作人员培训不足。然而,现场设置的质量控制程序不足以及组织液对毛细血管血的稀释也可能导致手指采血结果不准确。