Phillips S, Wyndham L, Shaw J, Walker S F
National Heart Foundation of Australia (NSW Division), Surry Hills.
Med J Aust. 1988 Aug 1;149(3):122-5.
This study compared the measurements of total cholesterol levels by means of a Reflotron dry-chemistry system and a standard laboratory method with the Hitachi 705 analyser. Simultaneous blood samples were collected by finger-prick and by venepuncture from 80 volunteers. The ranges of total cholesterol levels were 3.38-8.45 mmol/L (Reflotron) and 3.59-8.83 mmol/L (Hitachi). The mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) difference between the two methods was 0.22 +/- 0.30 mmol/L. All the subjects provided a second finger-prick sample of blood on the next day to assess the reproducibility of the Reflotron system. The mean (+/- SD) cholesterol levels that were obtained by the Reflotron method on Day 1 and Day 2 were 5.38 +/- 1.17 mmol/L and 5.30 +/- 1.14 mmol/L, respectively. These results did not differ significantly (mean difference, 0.079 mmol/L; standard error, 0.045 mmol/L). Provided that the operator is trained appropriately, the Reflotron system gives rapid, accurate and reproducible results.
本研究比较了使用Reflotron干化学系统和采用日立705分析仪的标准实验室方法测量总胆固醇水平的情况。通过手指针刺和静脉穿刺从80名志愿者身上同时采集血样。总胆固醇水平范围为3.38 - 8.45 mmol/L(Reflotron)和3.59 - 8.83 mmol/L(日立)。两种方法之间的平均(±标准差[SD])差异为0.22±0.30 mmol/L。所有受试者在第二天提供了第二份手指针刺血样,以评估Reflotron系统的可重复性。Reflotron方法在第1天和第2天获得的平均(±SD)胆固醇水平分别为5.38±1.17 mmol/L和5.30±1.14 mmol/L。这些结果差异不显著(平均差异,0.079 mmol/L;标准误差,0.045 mmol/L)。只要操作人员经过适当培训,Reflotron系统就能给出快速、准确且可重复的结果。