Pfizer, Inc, 10555 Science Center Dr, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Oct 9;10:126. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-126.
To examine the psychometric properties of the Injection Pen Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ) including the following: 1) item and scale characteristics (e.g., frequencies, item distributions, and factor structure), 2) reliability, and 3) validity.
Focus groups and one-on-one dyad interviews guided the development of the IPAQ. The IPAQ was subsequently tested in 136 parent-child dyads in a Phase 3, 2-month, open-label, multicenter trial for a new Genotropin(®) disposable pen. Factor analysis was performed to inform the development of a scoring algorithm, and reliability and validity of the IPAQ were evaluated using the data from this two months study. Psychometric analyses were conducted separately for each injection pen.
Confirmatory factor analysis provides evidence supporting a second order factor solution for four subscales and a total IPAQ score. These factor analysis results support the conceptual framework developed from previous qualitative research in patient dyads using the reusable pen. However, the IPAQ subscales did not consistently meet acceptable internal consistency reliability for some group level comparisons. Cronbach's alphas for the total IPAQ score for both pens were 0.85, exceeding acceptable levels of reliability for group comparisons.
The total IPAQ score is a useful measure for evaluating ease of use and preference for injection pens in clinical trials among patient dyads receiving hGH. The psychometric properties of the individual subscales, mainly the lower internal consistency reliability of some of the subscales and the predictive validity findings, do not support the use of subscale scores alone as a primary endpoint.
考察注射笔评估问卷(IPAQ)的心理测量学特性,包括:1)项目和量表特征(如频率、项目分布和因子结构),2)信度,和 3)效度。
焦点小组和一对一的对偶访谈指导了 IPAQ 的开发。随后,在一项新的 Genotropin(®)一次性笔的为期 2 个月、开放标签、多中心 3 期试验中,对 136 对父母-儿童进行了 IPAQ 测试。因子分析用于告知评分算法的开发,使用这两个月研究的数据评估 IPAQ 的信度和效度。对每个注射笔分别进行心理测量分析。
验证性因子分析为四个子量表和 IPAQ 总分的二阶因子解决方案提供了证据。这些因子分析结果支持了使用可重复使用笔在患者对偶体中进行的先前定性研究中开发的概念框架。然而,对于某些组级比较,IPAQ 子量表的内部一致性信度并不始终符合可接受的标准。两种笔的 IPAQ 总分的克朗巴赫α系数为 0.85,超过了组间比较可接受的可靠性水平。
在接受 hGH 治疗的患者对偶体中,进行临床试验时,IPAQ 总分是评估注射笔易用性和偏好的有用指标。个体子量表的心理测量学特性,主要是一些子量表的内部一致性信度较低和预测效度发现,不支持单独使用子量表评分作为主要终点。