Eli Lilly (M) Sdn Bhd, Cameron Highlands, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Oct 10;13:97. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-97.
To evaluate the efficacy of Counselling and Advisory Care for Health (COACH) programme in managing dyslipidaemia among primary care practices in Malaysia. This open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial compared the COACH programme delivered by primary care physicians alone (PCP arm) and primary care physicians assisted by nurse educators (PCP-NE arm).
This was a multi-centre, open label, randomised trial of a disease management programme (COACH) among dyslipidaemic patients in 21 Malaysia primary care practices. The participating centres enrolled 297 treatment naïve subjects who had the primary diagnosis of dyslipidaemia; 149 were randomised to the COACH programme delivered by primary care physicians assisted by nurse educators (PCP-NE) and 148 to care provided by primary care physicians (PCP) alone. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean percentage change from baseline LDL-C at week 24 between the 2 study arms. Secondary endpoints included mean percentage change from baseline of lipid profile (TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, TC: HDL ratio), Framingham Cardiovascular Health Risk Score and absolute risk change from baseline in blood pressure parameters at week 24. The study also assessed the sustainability of programme efficacy at week 36.
Both study arms demonstrated improvement in LDL-C from baseline. The least squares (LS) mean change from baseline LDL-C were -30.09% and -27.54% for PCP-NE and PCP respectively. The difference in mean change between groups was 2.55% (p=0.288), with a greater change seen in the PCP-NE arm. Similar observations were made between the study groups in relation to total cholesterol change at week 24. Significant difference in percentage change from baseline of HDL-C were observed between the PCP-NE and PCP groups, 3.01%, 95% CI 0.12-5.90, p=0.041, at week 24. There was no significant difference in lipid outcomes between 2 study groups at week 36 (12 weeks after the programme had ended).
Patients who received coaching and advice from primary care physicians (with or without the assistance by nurse educators) showed improvement in LDL-cholesterol. Disease management services delivered by PCP-NE demonstrated a trend towards add-on improvements in cholesterol control compared to care delivered by physicians alone; however, the improvements were not maintained when the services were withdrawn.
National Medical Research Registration (NMRR) Number: NMRR-08-287-1442Trial Registration Number (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier): NCT00708370.
评估咨询和健康顾问(COACH)计划在马来西亚基层医疗实践中管理血脂异常的疗效。这是一项开放标签、平行、随机对照试验,比较了由基层医疗医生单独提供(PCP 组)和由护士教育者辅助的基层医疗医生(PCP-NE 组)提供的 COACH 计划。
这是一项多中心、开放标签、随机试验,对 21 个马来西亚基层医疗实践中的血脂异常患者进行了疾病管理计划(COACH)。参与中心招募了 297 名初治患者,这些患者的主要诊断为血脂异常;149 名随机分配到由护士教育者辅助的基层医疗医生提供的 COACH 计划(PCP-NE),148 名分配到基层医疗医生单独提供的护理。主要疗效终点是治疗 24 周时两组之间 LDL-C 自基线的平均百分比变化。次要终点包括血脂谱(TC、LDL-C、HDL-C、TG、TC:HDL 比值)、弗雷明汉心血管健康风险评分和血压参数自基线的绝对风险变化的平均百分比变化在第 24 周。该研究还评估了计划在第 36 周的可持续性。
两组患者的 LDL-C 自基线均有所改善。PCP-NE 和 PCP 组 LDL-C 自基线的最小二乘(LS)平均变化分别为-30.09%和-27.54%。两组之间的平均变化差异为 2.55%(p=0.288),PCP-NE 组的变化更大。在第 24 周时,两组之间总胆固醇的变化也观察到了类似的结果。PCP-NE 和 PCP 组之间观察到 HDL-C 自基线的百分比变化有显著差异,分别为 3.01%,95%CI 0.12-5.90,p=0.041。两组在第 36 周(计划结束后 12 周)的血脂结果无显著差异。
接受基层医疗医生(有无护士教育者协助)提供的指导和建议的患者 LDL-胆固醇水平有所改善。与单独由医生提供护理相比,PCP-NE 提供的疾病管理服务显示出在改善胆固醇控制方面的附加趋势;然而,当服务停止时,这些改善并未持续。
国家医学研究登记处(NMRR)编号:NMRR-08-287-1442;临床试验注册编号(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符):NCT00708370。