• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

120-W 高功率系统 GreenLight 激光前列腺汽化术在高危患者中的应用。

The application of 120-W high-performance system GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate in high-risk patients.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Jul;28(4):1151-7. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1212-2. Epub 2012 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10103-012-1212-2
PMID:23053249
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 120-W potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser vaporization in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who also had cardiopulmonary diseases who were taking long-term anticoagulants and were at high risk of bleeding complications. The prospective study included 188 patients with severe lower urinary tract symptoms who underwent 120-W KTP laser vaporization of the prostate. All patients were at high cardiopulmonary risk, having presented with an American Society of Anesthesiology score of 3 or greater. Of those, 45 patients were taking oral anticoagulants, and 1 had a severe bleeding disorder. BPH was successfully treated with 120-W KTP laser vaporization in all patients. Mean preoperative prostate volume ± SD was 66 ± 23.1 ml, and mean operative time was 50.8 ± 15.5 min. There were no major complications intraoperatively or postoperatively, and no blood transfusions were required. Postoperatively, only 14 patients (7.4 %) required bladder irrigation. Average catheterization time was 1.9 ± 1.5 days (range, 1-5 days). Three patients required reoperation due to enlarged prostates from residual adenoma. At 3-, 6,- 12-, and 24-month follow-ups, mean urinary peak flow increased from 8.0 ± 3.6 ml/s to 19.1 ± 5.6, 19.2 ± 4.7, 19.1 ± 4.65, and 19.2 ± 4.34 ml/s, respectively. Mean International Prostate Symptom Scores decreased over time, from 25.6 ± 5.1 (3 months) to 9.4 ± 2.8, 7.05 ± 1.46, 6.24 ± 1.36, and 6.20 ± 1.32 (24 months), respectively. 120-W HPS KTP laser vaporization is a safe and effective treatment option in BPH patients at high risk and those on anticoagulation therapy who have severe LUTS secondary to BPH.

摘要

本研究旨在评估 120-W 钾钛磷酸(KTP)激光前列腺汽化术在合并心肺疾病、长期服用抗凝药物且存在出血并发症高危风险的良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者中的安全性和有效性。该前瞻性研究纳入了 188 例因严重下尿路症状而接受 120-W KTP 激光前列腺汽化术的患者。所有患者心肺风险较高,美国麻醉医师协会评分均为 3 分或更高。其中,45 例患者服用口服抗凝药物,1 例患者存在严重出血性疾病。所有患者均成功地接受了 120-W KTP 激光前列腺汽化术治疗。术前前列腺体积的平均值±标准差为 66±23.1ml,手术时间平均为 50.8±15.5min。术中及术后均无重大并发症发生,也无需输血。术后仅 14 例(7.4%)患者需要膀胱冲洗。平均导尿管留置时间为 1.9±1.5 天(1-5 天)。由于残留腺瘤,3 例患者因前列腺增大而需要再次手术。在 3、6、12 和 24 个月的随访中,平均尿流率从 8.0±3.6ml/s 增加到 19.1±5.6、19.2±4.7、19.1±4.65 和 19.2±4.34ml/s。国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)随时间逐渐降低,从 25.6±5.1(3 个月)降至 9.4±2.8、7.05±1.46、6.24±1.36 和 6.20±1.32(24 个月)。对于存在严重 BPH 所致下尿路症状且合并心肺疾病、长期服用抗凝药物且存在出血并发症高危风险的 BPH 患者,120-W HPS KTP 激光前列腺汽化术是一种安全且有效的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
The application of 120-W high-performance system GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate in high-risk patients.120-W 高功率系统 GreenLight 激光前列腺汽化术在高危患者中的应用。
Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Jul;28(4):1151-7. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1212-2. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
2
High power (80 W) potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate in 66 high risk patients.66例高危患者接受高功率(80瓦)磷酸钛钾激光前列腺汽化术。
J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):158-60. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000146631.14200.d4.
3
GreenLight 180W XPS photovaporization of the prostate: how I do it.前列腺的绿光180W XPS光汽化术:我的操作方法。
Can J Urol. 2011 Oct;18(5):5918-26.
4
Short term outcomes of high power (80 W) potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate.高功率(80瓦)磷酸钛钾激光前列腺汽化术的短期疗效
Eur Urol. 2005 Oct;48(4):608-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.07.013.
5
Comparison of vaporization using 120-W GreenLight laser versus 2-micrometer continuous laser for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: A 24-month follow-up study of a single center.120 瓦绿激光与 2 微米连续激光治疗良性前列腺增生的汽化效果比较:单中心 24 个月随访研究。
J Xray Sci Technol. 2019;27(4):755-764. doi: 10.3233/XST-190507.
6
Comparison of potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: update of a prospective non-randomized two-centre study.磷酸钛氧钾激光前列腺汽化术与经尿道前列腺切除术的比较:一项前瞻性非随机双中心研究的更新
BJU Int. 2008 Nov;102(10):1432-8; discussion 1438-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07905.x. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
7
Holmium:YAG transurethral incision versus laser photoselective vaporization for benign prostatic hyperplasia in a small prostate.钬激光经尿道前列腺切开术与激光光选择性汽化术治疗小前列腺良性前列腺增生的比较。
J Urol. 2014 Jan;191(1):148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.113. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
8
[Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) using 80 watt high power potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser for benign prostatic hyperplasia: the first fifty-seven patients in Japan].使用80瓦高功率磷酸钛氧钾(KTP)激光进行前列腺良性增生的光选择性汽化术(PVP):日本首批57例患者
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2006 Nov;97(7):815-22. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.97.815.
9
Photoselective vaporization of the prostate using high power (80 W) KTP laser: one year follow up of the first 101 patients in Japan.使用高功率(80瓦)KTP激光对前列腺进行光选择性汽化:日本首批101例患者的一年随访
Int J Urol. 2008 Dec;15(12):1067-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02181.x. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
10
Prospective single-centre comparison of 120-W diode-pumped solid-state high-intensity system laser vaporization of the prostate and 200-W high-intensive diode-laser ablation of the prostate for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia.前瞻性单中心比较120瓦二极管泵浦固态高强度系统激光汽化前列腺与200瓦高强度二极管激光消融前列腺治疗良性前列腺增生症的效果。
BJU Int. 2009 Sep;104(6):820-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08452.x. Epub 2009 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Three Surgical Instruments in the Treatment of High Critical Enucleation of Prostate.三种手术器械治疗高危前列腺切除术的对比分析。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Sep 1;25(9):3023-3028. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.9.3023.
2
Reoperation after surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review.良性前列腺增生症手术治疗后的再次手术:系统评价。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 9;14:1287212. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1287212. eCollection 2023.
3
The safety and efficacy of front-firing green-light laser endoscopic en bloc photoselective vapo-enucleation of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up.绿光 HPS 120-W 激光汽化术与经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生引起的下尿路症状:一项 2 年随访的随机临床试验。
Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):734-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.043. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
2
120-W GreenLight laser photoselective vaporization of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: midterm outcomes.120-W 绿光激光前列腺选择性光汽化术治疗良性前列腺增生:中期结果。
Urology. 2011 Jul;78(1):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.085. Epub 2011 May 7.
3
前向发射绿光激光内镜整块光选择性汽化术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的安全性和有效性
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Aug 11;13:983-988. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S141900. eCollection 2017.
4
The efficacy and safety of 2-μm continuous laser in the treatment of high-risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.2微米连续激光治疗良性前列腺增生高危患者的疗效与安全性
Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Feb;32(2):351-356. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2122-5. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
5
[Current Practice in the Transurethral Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction under Oral Anticoagulants : A Nation-wide Survey].[口服抗凝剂治疗下经尿道良性前列腺梗阻的当前实践:一项全国性调查]
Urologe A. 2016 Jun;55(6):792-800. doi: 10.1007/s00120-016-0029-1.
6
Laser treatment of benign prostate enlargement--which laser for which prostate?激光治疗良性前列腺增生——哪种激光治疗哪种前列腺?
Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Mar;11(3):142-52. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.23. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
7
[Prostate laser photovaporisation in patients at high risk of bleeding].[前列腺激光汽化术用于出血高风险患者]
Pan Afr Med J. 2013 Sep 3;16:2. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2013.16.2.2853. eCollection 2013.
8
Review of current laser therapies for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.当前用于治疗良性前列腺增生的激光疗法综述。
Korean J Urol. 2013 Jun;54(6):351-8. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.6.351. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with midterm follow-up.
GreenLight HPS 120-W 激光汽化术与经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生的随机临床试验:中期随访。
Eur Urol. 2010 Sep;58(3):349-55. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.05.026. Epub 2010 May 27.
4
High-performance system GreenLight laser: indications and outcomes.高性能系统绿光激光:适应症与治疗结果
Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jan;19(1):33-7. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328317cab3.
5
Short-term outcomes of Greenlight HPS laser photoselective vaporization prostatectomy (PVP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).绿激光高功率选择性汽化前列腺切除术(PVP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的短期疗效
J Endourol. 2008 Oct;22(10):2341-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.9708.
6
Comparison of potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: update of a prospective non-randomized two-centre study.磷酸钛氧钾激光前列腺汽化术与经尿道前列腺切除术的比较:一项前瞻性非随机双中心研究的更新
BJU Int. 2008 Nov;102(10):1432-8; discussion 1438-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07905.x. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
7
Comparison of photoselective vaporization of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective nonrandomized bicenter trial with 2-year follow-up.前列腺光选择性汽化术与经尿道前列腺切除术的比较:一项为期2年随访的前瞻性非随机双中心试验。
J Endourol. 2008 Jul;22(7):1519-25. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0321.
8
GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate: single-center experience and long-term results after 500 procedures.前列腺绿激光汽化术:500例手术的单中心经验及长期结果
Eur Urol. 2008 Oct;54(4):893-901. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.053. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
9
The evolution of KTP laser vaporization of the prostate.前列腺的KTP激光汽化术的发展历程。
Yonsei Med J. 2008 Apr 30;49(2):189-99. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2008.49.2.189.
10
Rapid communication: photoselective vaporization of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the large prostate: a prospective nonrandomized bicenter trial with 2-year follow-up.快速通讯:大前列腺患者的前列腺光选择性汽化术与经尿道前列腺切除术对比:一项为期2年随访的前瞻性非随机双中心试验
J Endourol. 2008 Feb;22(2):347-53. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0137.