Suppr超能文献

髋臼周围原发性肿瘤的受限型全髋关节假体置换。

Constrained total hip megaprosthesis for primary periacetabular tumors.

机构信息

Osaka University Orthopaedic Oncology Group, Osaka, Japan,

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Mar;471(3):741-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2625-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limb-salvage reconstruction for periacetabular malignant tumors is one of the most challenging problems in orthopaedic oncology. Reconstructive options include resection arthroplasty, endoprosthesis, allograft, recycled autobone graft, arthrodesis, and pseudarthrosis. However, no standard procedure exists because of rarity and clinical variability of the disease. We previously developed a megaprosthetic system with a constrained total hip mechanism (C-THA).

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We evaluated (1) survival of patients and C-THA; (2) postoperative function; and (3) complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients with primary periacetabular tumors treated using C-THA between 1985 and 2009. There were 18 male and seven female patients with a median age of 44 years (range, 16-72 years). They included 11 chondrosarcomas, eight osteosarcomas, two giant cell tumors of bone (one locally aggressive benign, one malignant), and others in four. Surgical margin was wide in 18 patients, marginal in five, and intralesional in two. The minimum postoperative followup for survivors was 32 months (median, 163 months; range, 32-285 months).

RESULTS

The 10-year overall survival rate of all patients was 47%. C-THA implants survived in 19 of 25 patients at last followup. Twenty-one patients acquired ambulatory activity. There were seven local recurrences, resulting in hemipelvectomy in one patient. Postoperative complications included deep infection in eight of the 25 patients, dislocation in four, and aseptic loosening in two, necessitating five revision surgeries and three implant removals.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations suggest C-THA using an acetabular reconstruction cup is a useful reconstructive option after resection of periacetabular malignant tumors despite frequent postoperative complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

保肢重建术是治疗髋臼周围恶性肿瘤的最具挑战性的问题之一。重建选择包括关节切除成形术、假体、同种异体移植物、再循环自体骨移植物、融合术和假关节。然而,由于疾病的罕见性和临床变异性,目前还没有标准的程序。我们之前开发了一种带有约束性全髋关节机制(C-THA)的大型假体系统。

问题/目的:我们评估了(1)患者和 C-THA 的生存率;(2)术后功能;(3)并发症。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 1985 年至 2009 年间采用 C-THA 治疗的 25 例原发性髋臼周围肿瘤患者。18 例为男性,7 例为女性,中位年龄为 44 岁(范围,16-72 岁)。其中包括 11 例软骨肉瘤、8 例骨肉瘤、2 例骨巨细胞瘤(1 例为局部侵袭性良性,1 例为恶性)和 4 例其他类型肿瘤。18 例患者的手术切缘为广泛,5 例为边缘,2 例为肿瘤内。所有幸存者的最低术后随访时间为 32 个月(中位数为 163 个月;范围,32-285 个月)。

结果

所有患者的 10 年总生存率为 47%。在最后一次随访时,25 例患者中有 19 例 C-THA 植入物存活。21 例患者获得了活动能力。有 7 例局部复发,导致 1 例患者行半骨盆切除术。术后并发症包括 25 例患者中有 8 例深部感染、4 例脱位和 2 例无菌性松动,需要进行 5 次翻修手术和 3 次植入物取出。

结论

尽管术后并发症频繁,但我们的观察表明,对于髋臼周围恶性肿瘤切除后,使用髋臼重建杯的 C-THA 是一种有用的重建选择。

证据水平

IV 级,治疗性研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。

相似文献

1
Constrained total hip megaprosthesis for primary periacetabular tumors.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Mar;471(3):741-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2625-8.
2
LUMiC Endoprosthetic Reconstruction After Periacetabular Tumor Resection: Short-term Results.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Mar;475(3):686-695. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4805-4.
3
4
Acetabular Reconstruction With Femoral Head Autograft After Intraarticular Resection of Periacetabular Tumors is Durable at Short-term Followup.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):3060-3070. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5505-4. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
5
Reconstruction After Hemipelvectomy With the Ice-Cream Cone Prosthesis: What Are the Short-term Clinical Results?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Mar;475(3):735-741. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4747-x.
6
Surgical technique: Porous tantalum reconstruction for destructive nonprimary periacetabular tumors.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):594-601. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2117-2. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
9
Can Dislocation of a Constrained Liner Be Salvaged With Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):305-312. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000026.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and Epidemiology of Megaprostheses Infections: A Systematic Review.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 27;12(13):1283. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131283.
3
Clinical Outcome and Fracture Risk Prediction of Benign Bone Tumors on the Acetabular Dome: 7-Year Clinical Experience and a Finite Element Analysis.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Mar 14;2022:5150474. doi: 10.1155/2022/5150474. eCollection 2022.
5
Periacetabular reconstruction following limb-salvage surgery for pelvic sarcomas.
J Bone Oncol. 2021 Oct 18;31:100396. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100396. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Partial replacement of pelvis with the hip joint in osteosarcoma treatment: A case report.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Sep 8;70:102812. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102812. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
Megaprosthesis Versus Allograft Prosthesis Composite for the Management of Massive Skeletal Defects: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021 Jun;14(3):255-270. doi: 10.1007/s12178-021-09707-6. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
9
Pelvic reconstruction using an ice-cream cone prosthesis: correlation between the inserted length of the coned stem and surgical outcome.
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun;26(6):1139-1146. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-01882-3. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
10
Pelvic reconstruction following resection of tumour involving the whole ilium and acetabulum.
J Bone Oncol. 2019 Mar 27;16:100234. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2019.100234. eCollection 2019 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Ice-cream cone reconstruction of the pelvis: a new type of pelvic replacement: early results.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 May;93(5):684-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.25608.
2
Antibacterial iodine-supported titanium implants.
Acta Biomater. 2011 Apr;7(4):1928-33. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.036. Epub 2010 Nov 27.
3
Periacetabular reconstruction with a new endoprosthesis.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Nov;467(11):2831-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1043-z. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
4
Limb-salvage reconstruction with MUTARS hemipelvic endoprosthesis: a prospective multicenter study.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Dec;35(12):1318-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.04.011. Epub 2009 May 24.
5
The Friedman-Eilber resection arthroplasty of the pelvis.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Nov;467(11):2825-30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0844-4. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
6
Peri-acetabular resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction for tumours of the acetabulum.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Sep;90(9):1222-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.20758.
7
The use of pasteurized autologous grafts for periacetabular reconstruction.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Nov;464:217-23. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3181583ae4.
8
Reconstruction with modular hemipelvic prostheses for periacetabular tumor.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Aug;461:180-8. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31806165d5.
9
Lack of toxicological side-effects in silver-coated megaprostheses in humans.
Biomaterials. 2007 Jun;28(18):2869-75. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.033. Epub 2007 Mar 3.
10
Pelvic reconstruction using saddle prosthesis following limb salvage operation for periacetabular tumour.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2006 Aug;14(2):155-62. doi: 10.1177/230949900601400210.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验