Williams Patrick D, Callanan David, Solley Wayne, Avery Robert L, Pieramici Dante J, Aaberg Tom
Texas Retina Associates, Dallas, TX.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:1519-25. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S31010. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
This prospective multi-center pilot study compares the use of half-fluence photodynamic therapy combined with ranibizumab with ranibizumab monotherapy for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
All patients presenting with untreated subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration were considered for inclusion. Patients were randomized to receive either ranibizumab with half-fluence photodynamic therapy or ranibizumab alone. Patients in the ranibizumab alone group were given three consecutive monthly ranibizumab injections and were followed monthly. They were treated with ranibizumab as needed, based on clinical discretion, using vision and optical coherence tomography. Patients in the combined group were given one same-day combined ranibizumab and half-fluence (25 j/cm(2)) photodynamic therapy treatment and were treated monthly as needed. Outcomes included changes in standardized visual acuity, optical coherence tomography foveal thickness, and percentage of as-needed injections to maintenance examinations.
Fifty-six out of 60 enrolled patients completed the twelve month primary outcome visit; this consisted of 27 patients receiving ranibizumab alone and 29 receiving combined treatment. The average age was 79.1 for the ranibizumab alone group and 79.3 for the combined group. The mean visual acuity in the ranibizumab alone group improved from 52.9 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy letters initially to 62.8 letters at twelve months. The mean visual acuity in the combined group improved from 49.2 letters to 51.8 letters at twelve months. The differences in visual acuity improvements were not statistically significant based on a two-tailed t-test (P = 0.2). Due to the presence of outliers in each group, a Mann-Whitney U test was performed to confirm the results (U = 325; P = 0.28). The mean optical coherence tomography foveal thickness improved 92.5 microns and 106.7 microns in the ranibizumab alone and the combined group, respectively. The difference was not significant based on a two-tailed t-test (P = 0.6). The ranibizumab alone group received an average of 6.8 injections, while the combined group received an average of three injections. This difference was not significant based on a chi-square test (P = 0.11).
The groups appeared similar based on statistical analysis, but larger studies are needed to determine possible small differences between combination therapy and monotherapy.
这项前瞻性多中心试点研究比较了半剂量光动力疗法联合雷珠单抗与雷珠单抗单药治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的效果。
纳入所有患有未经治疗的黄斑中心凹下新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的患者。患者被随机分为接受雷珠单抗联合半剂量光动力疗法或仅接受雷珠单抗治疗两组。仅接受雷珠单抗治疗的组患者连续三个月每月注射一次雷珠单抗,并每月进行随访。根据临床判断,依据视力和光学相干断层扫描结果,必要时对他们进行雷珠单抗治疗。联合治疗组患者在同一天接受雷珠单抗和半剂量(25J/cm²)光动力疗法联合治疗,并根据需要每月进行治疗。观察指标包括标准视力的变化、光学相干断层扫描测量的黄斑中心凹厚度,以及维持检查所需注射次数的百分比。
60名入组患者中有56名完成了为期12个月的主要观察指标随访;其中27名患者仅接受雷珠单抗治疗,29名患者接受联合治疗。仅接受雷珠单抗治疗组的平均年龄为79.1岁,联合治疗组为79.3岁。仅接受雷珠单抗治疗组的平均视力从最初的糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗视力表52.9字母提高到12个月时的62.8字母。联合治疗组的平均视力从49.2字母提高到12个月时的51.8字母。基于双尾t检验,视力改善的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.2)。由于每组均存在异常值,因此进行了曼-惠特尼U检验以确认结果(U = 325;P = 0.28)。仅接受雷珠单抗治疗组和联合治疗组的光学相干断层扫描测量的黄斑中心凹厚度平均分别改善了92.5微米和106.7微米。基于双尾t检验,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.6)。仅接受雷珠单抗治疗组平均接受了6.8次注射,而联合治疗组平均接受了3次注射。基于卡方检验,这种差异无统计学意义(P = 0.11)。
基于统计分析,两组结果相似,但需要更大规模的研究来确定联合治疗与单药治疗之间可能存在的细微差异。