Vanderbilt University, TN, USA.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Dec;32(8):704-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
A large body of research has demonstrated that affective disorders are characterized by attentional biases for emotional stimuli. However, this research relies heavily on manual reaction time (RT) measures that cannot fully delineate the time course and components of attentional bias. Eye tracking technology, which allows relatively direct and continuous measurement of overt visual attention, may provide an important supplement to RT measures. This article reviews eye tracking research on anxiety and depression, evaluating the experimental paradigms and eye movement indicators used to study attentional biases. Also included is a meta-analysis of extant eye tracking research (33 experiments; N=1579) on both anxiety and depression. Relative to controls, anxious individuals showed increased vigilance for threat during free viewing and visual search, and showed difficulty disengaging from threat in visual search tasks, but not during free viewing. In contrast, depressed individuals were not characterized by vigilance for threat during free viewing, but were characterized by reduced orienting to positive stimuli, as well as reduced maintenance of gaze on positive stimuli and increased maintenance of gaze on dysphoric stimuli. Implications of these findings for theoretical accounts of attentional bias in anxiety and depression are discussed, and avenues for future research using eye-tracking technology are outlined.
大量研究表明,情感障碍的特征是对情绪刺激的注意力偏差。然而,这项研究严重依赖于手动反应时间 (RT) 测量,而这些测量无法完全描绘注意力偏差的时间进程和组成部分。眼动追踪技术可以相对直接和连续地测量外显视觉注意力,可能为 RT 测量提供重要补充。本文回顾了关于焦虑和抑郁的眼动追踪研究,评估了用于研究注意力偏差的实验范式和眼动指标。还包括对焦虑和抑郁的现有眼动追踪研究(33 个实验;N=1579)的荟萃分析。与对照组相比,焦虑个体在自由观看和视觉搜索中对威胁表现出更高的警觉性,并且在视觉搜索任务中难以从威胁中解脱出来,但在自由观看中则不会。相比之下,抑郁个体在自由观看时并不表现出对威胁的警觉性,但表现出对积极刺激的定向减少,以及对积极刺激的注视维持减少和对烦躁刺激的注视维持增加。讨论了这些发现对焦虑和抑郁中注意力偏差理论解释的意义,并概述了使用眼动追踪技术的未来研究途径。