Suppr超能文献

自然场景观看中不存在情绪“突显”效应。

No emotional "pop-out" effect in natural scene viewing.

机构信息

Neuroinformatics Doctoral Training Center, Institute for Adaptive & Neural Computation, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Emotion. 2011 Oct;11(5):1134-43. doi: 10.1037/a0022586.

Abstract

It has been shown that attention is drawn toward emotional stimuli. In particular, eye movement research suggests that gaze is attracted toward emotional stimuli in an unconscious, automated manner. We addressed whether this effect remains when emotional targets are embedded within complex real-world scenes. Eye movements were recorded while participants memorized natural images. Each image contained an item that was either neutral, such as a bag, or emotional, such as a snake or a couple hugging. We found no latency difference for the first target fixation between the emotional and neutral conditions, suggesting no extrafoveal "pop-out" effect of emotional targets. However, once detected, emotional targets held attention for a longer time than neutral targets. The failure of emotional items to attract attention seems to contradict previous eye-movement research using emotional stimuli. However, our results are consistent with studies examining semantic drive of overt attention in natural scenes. Interpretations of the results in terms of perceptual and attentional load are provided.

摘要

已经有研究表明,人们的注意力会被吸引到情绪性刺激上。特别是,眼动研究表明,人们会以无意识、自动的方式被情绪性刺激所吸引。我们探讨了当情绪性目标嵌入复杂的真实场景中时,这种效应是否仍然存在。参与者在记忆自然图像时记录了他们的眼动。每张图像中都包含一个物品,这个物品要么是中性的,如一个包,要么是情绪性的,如一条蛇或一对拥抱的情侣。我们发现,在情绪和中性条件下,第一个目标注视的潜伏期没有差异,这表明情绪性目标没有额外的“突显”效应。然而,一旦被检测到,情绪性目标比中性目标更能吸引注意力。情绪性项目未能吸引注意力的现象似乎与之前使用情绪性刺激的眼动研究相矛盾。然而,我们的结果与研究自然场景中显性注意力的语义驱动是一致的。我们提供了从感知和注意负荷的角度来解释这些结果的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验