Suppr超能文献

挑战电子问卷所报告的缺点,并解决在线数据收集的方法学问题。

Challenging the reported disadvantages of e-questionnaires and addressing methodological issues of online data collection.

作者信息

Hunter Louise

机构信息

University of West London, Brentford, UK.

出版信息

Nurse Res. 2012;20(1):11-20. doi: 10.7748/nr2012.09.20.1.11.c9303.

Abstract

AIM

To review the advantages and disadvantages of e-questionnaires, and question whether or not reported disadvantages remain valid or can be limited or circumvented.

BACKGROUND

The internet is likely to become the dominant medium for survey distribution, yet nurses and midwives have been slow to use online technology for research involving questionnaires. Relatively little is known about optimal methods of harnessing the internet's potential in health studies.

DATA SOURCE

A small e-questionnaire of health workers.

REVIEW METHODS

The Medline and Maternity and Infant Care databases were searched for articles containing the words 'web', 'online', or 'internet' and 'survey' or 'questionnaire'. The search was restricted to articles in English published since 2000. The reference lists of retrieved articles were also searched.

DISCUSSION

Reported disadvantages of online data collection, such as sample bias, psychometric distortions, 'technophobia' and lower response rates are discussed and challenged. The author reports her experience of conducting a survey with an e-questionnaire to contribute to the limited body of knowledge in this area, and suggests how to maximise the quantity and quality of responses to e-questionnaires.

CONCLUSION

E-questionnaires offer the researcher an inexpensive, quick and convenient way to collect data. Many of the reported disadvantages of the medium are no longer valid. The science of conducting the perfect e-survey is emerging. However, the lessons learned in the author's study, together with other research, seem to suggest that satisfactory response rates and data quality can be achieved in a relatively short time if certain tactics are used.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH/PRACTICE: To get the best results from e-questionnaires, it is suggested that the questionnaire recipients should be targeted carefully and that the value of their potential contribution to the project should be emphasised. E-questionnaires should be convenient, quick and easy to access, and be set out in a way that encourages full and complete responses.

摘要

目的

回顾电子问卷的优缺点,并探讨所报道的缺点是否仍然成立,或者是否可以加以限制或规避。

背景

互联网可能会成为调查分发的主要媒介,但护士和助产士在将在线技术用于涉及问卷的研究方面进展缓慢。对于在健康研究中利用互联网潜力的最佳方法,人们了解得相对较少。

数据来源

一份针对卫生工作者的小型电子问卷。

综述方法

在Medline以及母婴护理数据库中搜索包含“网络”“在线”或“互联网”以及“调查”或“问卷”的文章。搜索仅限于2000年以来发表的英文文章。还对检索到的文章的参考文献列表进行了搜索。

讨论

对所报道的在线数据收集的缺点,如样本偏差、心理测量失真、“技术恐惧”和较低的回复率进行了讨论并提出质疑。作者报告了她使用电子问卷进行调查的经验,以丰富该领域有限的知识,并提出了如何最大限度地提高电子问卷回复的数量和质量。

结论

电子问卷为研究人员提供了一种廉价、快速且便捷的数据收集方式。所报道的该媒介的许多缺点已不再成立。进行完美电子调查的科学正在兴起。然而,作者研究中吸取的经验教训以及其他研究似乎表明,如果采用某些策略,在相对较短的时间内可以实现令人满意的回复率和数据质量。

对研究/实践的启示:为了从电子问卷中获得最佳结果,建议仔细确定问卷接收者,并强调他们对项目潜在贡献的值。电子问卷应该方便、快速且易于访问,并以鼓励完整和全面回复的方式呈现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验