Introduction: The Health Care Reform Law (PPACA): controversies in ethics and policy.
作者信息
Sade Robert M
机构信息
Medical University of South Carolina.
出版信息
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Fall;40(3):523-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00684.x.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Introduction: The Health Care Reform Law (PPACA): controversies in ethics and policy.引言：《医疗保健改革法》（《患者保护与平价医疗法案》）：伦理与政策方面的争议
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Fall;40(3):523-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00684.x.
2
The Affordable Care Act and the Supreme Court: American health care reform inches forward despite dysfunctional political institutions and politics.《平价医疗法案》与最高法院：尽管政治体制和政治运作存在失灵情况，但美国医疗保健改革仍在稳步推进。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Jan;8(1):113-8. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000370.
3
The US Supreme Court decision on the constitutional legitimacy of the Affordable Care Act.美国最高法院关于《平价医疗法案》合宪性的裁决。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Jan;8(1):111-2. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000369.
4
Health care reform after the Supreme Court: even more known unknowns.最高法院裁决后的医疗保健改革：更多未知的未知因素。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Jan;8(1):139-43. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000412.
5
US Supreme Court hears arguments against health reform act.美国最高法院听取对医疗改革法案的反对意见。
BMJ. 2012 Apr 2;344:e2463. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2463.
6
Affordable convergence: "reasonable interpretation" and the Affordable Care Act.
Harv Law Rev. 2012 Nov;126(1):117-49.
7
US Republicans will attack individual provisions of health reform law as repeal is unlikely.由于废除医改法案不太可能实现，美国共和党人将抨击医改法案的个别条款。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 6;350:h58. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h58.
8
Lessons to improve the efficiency and equity of health reform.提高医疗改革效率与公平性的经验教训。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2012 Sep-Oct;42(5):21-4. doi: 10.1002/hast.71.
9
US Supreme Court decides in favour of the Affordable Care Act.
Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61184-9.
10
Much ado about nothing: the US Supreme Court's rules on health reform.无事生非：美国最高法院关于医疗改革的规定。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Jan;8(1):125-32. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000394.
引用本文的文献
1
Evaluation of 30-day hospital readmission after surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer in a medicare population.医疗保险人群中晚期卵巢癌术后30天再入院情况的评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 20;32(36):4113-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7743. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
本文引用的文献
1
No theory of justice can ground health care reform.没有一种正义理论可以为医疗改革提供依据。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Fall;40(3):598-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00692.x.
2
Justice and fairness: a critical element in U.S. health system reform.公正与公平：美国医疗体系改革的关键要素。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Fall;40(3):582-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00691.x.
3
Cost-sharing under consumer-driven health care will not reform U.S. health care.消费者驱动的医疗保健下的成本分担不会改革美国的医疗保健。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Fall;40(3):574-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00690.x.
4
Expanding choice through defined contributions: overcoming a non-participatory health care economy.通过设定缴费来扩大选择范围：克服非参与式的医疗经济。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Fall;40(3):558-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00689.x.
5
Government intervention in health care markets is practical, necessary, and morally sound.政府干预医疗保健市场是切实可行、必要且合理的。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Fall;40(3):547-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00688.x.
6
Market-based reforms in health care are both practical and morally sound.医疗保健的市场化改革既切实可行，又符合道德规范。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Fall;40(3):537-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00687.x.
7
Medical responsibility.医疗责任。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Fall;40(3):532-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00686.x.
8
Physicians have a responsibility to meet the health care needs of society.医生有责任满足社会的医疗保健需求。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Fall;40(3):526-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00685.x.
9
The dénouement of the Supreme Court's ACA drama.最高法院关于《平价医疗法案》风波的结局。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):198-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1206847. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
Zotero 插件